From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/2] ACPI, PCI, irq: remove interrupt count restriction Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 14:17:51 -0500 Message-ID: <56842DDF.6040109@codeaurora.org> References: <1449677909-12432-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <1449677909-12432-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <56686037.70109@codeaurora.org> <56686171.5060102@codeaurora.org> <5683DAD3.4080006@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Christopher Covington , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , Timur Tabi , jcm@redhat.com, helgaas@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 12/30/2015 8:28 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Yep, I meant not to use an additional variable. > >> > BTW, I suggest you spend some time around checkpatch for contributions. I could >> > have caught most of the issues you are generally concerned before submitting a patch. > Is it a question? It is a request not a question. I hate wasting your time and my time with things that I could have fixed before submitting a patch. I ran the checkpatch and it said I'm good to go. But, obviously I'm not. -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project