From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Prakash, Prashanth" Subject: Re: [Linaro-acpi] [PATCH V2 1/4] ACPI / CPPC: Optimize PCC Read Write operations Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:41:27 -0700 Message-ID: <56A7A1B7.30808@codeaurora.org> References: <1453511240-20792-1-git-send-email-pprakash@codeaurora.org> <1453511240-20792-2-git-send-email-pprakash@codeaurora.org> <56A68A03.4090101@codeaurora.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:53136 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964834AbcAZQla (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jan 2016 11:41:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56A68A03.4090101@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Timur Tabi , Ashwin Chaugule Cc: linux acpi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linaro ACPI Mailman List Hi Ashwin/Timur, >> Unless Rafael thinks otherwise, I see no major issues in V2, so there >> is no need for a respin. > > I think stripping away the __iomem is wrong. The whole point behind the 'sparse' tool is to catch invalid accesses to I/O memory. When you typecast it away, then prevent sparse from catching those problem. Thanks for your inputs. I will wait for few more days for feedback from Rafael and others before another respin with the suggested changes. Thanks, Prashanth