From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tomasz Nowicki <tn@semihalf.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 22/23] arm64, pci, acpi: Assign legacy IRQs once device
 is enable.
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 19:46:22 +0100
Message-ID: <56BCD6FE.4030107@semihalf.com>
References: <1454606941-9523-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>
 <1454606941-9523-23-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com>
 <20160211115843.GA24136@red-moon>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160211115843.GA24136@red-moon>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, okaya@codeaurora.org, jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, Stefano.Stabellini@eu.citrix.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, mw@semihalf.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, jchandra@broadcom.com, jcm@redhat.com
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On 11.02.2016 12:58, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> As for the MSI check, by reading commit history its need I think
> it harks back to bba6f6fc, which was supposed to be a quick hack and it
> has been in the kernel for 9 years:), is it really needed ?

IMO, yes it is needed. We need to chose MSI vs IRQ, and MSI is 
preferable option.

Tomasz