From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sinan Kaya Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] acpi,pci,irq: reduce resource requirements Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 21:28:42 -0400 Message-ID: <57085ACA.2040108@codeaurora.org> References: <1457484079-18202-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> <20160314185251.GA19703@localhost> <56E7211F.3070203@codeaurora.org> <20160314210147.GA11459@localhost> <56E73232.9030704@codeaurora.org> <20160315014843.GA16967@localhost> <56E7733B.4050308@codeaurora.org> <20160315023632.GA23940@localhost> <56E80F19.7010503@codeaurora.org> <56EEE925.7070202@codeaurora.org> <20160405232124.GH15353@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160405232124.GH15353@localhost> Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, lenb@kernel.org, harish.k@hpe.com, ashwin.reghunandanan@hpe.com, bhelgaas@google.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Bjorn, On 4/5/2016 7:21 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> I know you want to validate that all PCI interrupts are level, it looks like the code >> > is allowing other combinations. > It's not that we need to validate that all PCI interrupts are level. What > we need is to make sure all users sharing an IRQ agree on the mode. > I posted v2. Let me know if the implementation feels like what you are looking for. Sinan -- Sinan Kaya Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project