[PATCH v11 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

[PATCH v11 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

[Shannon Zhao]

From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>

ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.

CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> (supporter:ACPI)
CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> (supporter:ACPI)
CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/acpi/scan.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 5f28cf7..cfc73fe 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
 LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
 
+/*
+ * The UART device described by the SPCR table is the only object which needs
+ * special-casing. Everything else is covered by ACPI namespace paths in STAO
+ * table.
+ */
+static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
+
 struct acpi_dep_data {
 	struct list_head node;
 	acpi_handle master;
@@ -1453,6 +1460,41 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares,
+					    void *context)
+{
+	struct resource *res = context;
+
+	if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res))
+		return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
+
+	return AE_OK;
+}
+
+static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct resource res;
+
+	/* Check if it should ignore the UART device */
+	if (!(spcr_uart_addr && acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS)))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * The UART device described in SPCR table is assumed to have only one
+	 * memory resource present. So we only look for the first one here.
+	 */
+	status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
+				     acpi_get_resource_memory, &res);
+	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || res.start != spcr_uart_addr)
+		return false;
+
+	acpi_handle_info(handle, "The UART device @%pa in SPCR table will be hidden\n",
+			 &res.start);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
 				    unsigned long long *sta)
 {
@@ -1466,6 +1508,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
 	switch (acpi_type) {
 	case ACPI_TYPE_ANY:		/* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */
 	case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
+		if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle))
+			return -ENODEV;
+
 		*type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE;
 		status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta);
 		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
@@ -1916,9 +1961,24 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
 	return result < 0 ? result : 0;
 }
 
+static void __init acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(void)
+{
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr;
+
+	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
+				(struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+		spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address;
+	else
+		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n");
+}
+
 int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 {
 	int result;
+	acpi_status status;
+	struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr;
 
 	acpi_pci_root_init();
 	acpi_pci_link_init();
@@ -1934,6 +1994,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
 
 	acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler);
 
+	/*
+	 * If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART
+	 * device in SPCR table.
+	 */
+	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0,
+				(struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr);
+	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+		if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao))
+			printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported.");
+
+		if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart)
+			acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr();
+	}
+
 	mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
 	/*
 	 * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
-- 
2.0.4

Re: [PATCH v11 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

[Shannon Zhao]

Hi Rafael，

Could you please give your comments on this patch? Thanks in advanced!

On 2016/4/7 20:03, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> 
> ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
> by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
> UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
> 
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org> (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org (open list:ACPI)
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 5f28cf7..cfc73fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
>  LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
>  
> +/*
> + * The UART device described by the SPCR table is the only object which needs
> + * special-casing. Everything else is covered by ACPI namespace paths in STAO
> + * table.
> + */
> +static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
> +
>  struct acpi_dep_data {
>  	struct list_head node;
>  	acpi_handle master;
> @@ -1453,6 +1460,41 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> +					    void *context)
> +{
> +	struct resource *res = context;
> +
> +	if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res))
> +		return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
> +
> +	return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
> +{
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	struct resource res;
> +
> +	/* Check if it should ignore the UART device */
> +	if (!(spcr_uart_addr && acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS)))
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The UART device described in SPCR table is assumed to have only one
> +	 * memory resource present. So we only look for the first one here.
> +	 */
> +	status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> +				     acpi_get_resource_memory, &res);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || res.start != spcr_uart_addr)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	acpi_handle_info(handle, "The UART device @%pa in SPCR table will be hidden\n",
> +			 &res.start);
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
>  				    unsigned long long *sta)
>  {
> @@ -1466,6 +1508,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
>  	switch (acpi_type) {
>  	case ACPI_TYPE_ANY:		/* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */
>  	case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
> +		if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
>  		*type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE;
>  		status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta);
>  		if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> @@ -1916,9 +1961,24 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
>  	return result < 0 ? result : 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void __init acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(void)
> +{
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr;
> +
> +	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
> +				(struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +		spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address;
> +	else
> +		printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n");
> +}
> +
>  int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>  {
>  	int result;
> +	acpi_status status;
> +	struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr;
>  
>  	acpi_pci_root_init();
>  	acpi_pci_link_init();
> @@ -1934,6 +1994,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>  
>  	acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART
> +	 * device in SPCR table.
> +	 */
> +	status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0,
> +				(struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> +		if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao))
> +			printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported.");
> +
> +		if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart)
> +			acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr();
> +	}
> +
>  	mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
>  	/*
>  	 * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
> 

-- 
Shannon

Re: [PATCH v11 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi Rafael，
>
> Could you please give your comments on this patch? Thanks in advanced!

I was traveling last week, sorry for the slow response.

Re: [PATCH v11 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
>
> ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
> by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
> UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
>
> CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org> (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: Len Brown <lenb-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> (supporter:ACPI)
> CC: linux-acpi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org (open list:ACPI)
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>

> ---
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> index 5f28cf7..cfc73fe 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
>  LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
>
> +/*
> + * The UART device described by the SPCR table is the only object which needs
> + * special-casing. Everything else is covered by ACPI namespace paths in STAO
> + * table.
> + */
> +static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
> +
>  struct acpi_dep_data {
>         struct list_head node;
>         acpi_handle master;
> @@ -1453,6 +1460,41 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> +static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> +                                           void *context)
> +{
> +       struct resource *res = context;
> +
> +       if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res))
> +               return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
> +
> +       return AE_OK;
> +}
> +
> +static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
> +{
> +       acpi_status status;
> +       struct resource res;
> +
> +       /* Check if it should ignore the UART device */
> +       if (!(spcr_uart_addr && acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS)))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * The UART device described in SPCR table is assumed to have only one
> +        * memory resource present. So we only look for the first one here.
> +        */
> +       status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> +                                    acpi_get_resource_memory, &res);
> +       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || res.start != spcr_uart_addr)
> +               return false;
> +
> +       acpi_handle_info(handle, "The UART device @%pa in SPCR table will be hidden\n",
> +                        &res.start);
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
>  static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
>                                     unsigned long long *sta)
>  {
> @@ -1466,6 +1508,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
>         switch (acpi_type) {
>         case ACPI_TYPE_ANY:             /* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */
>         case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
> +               if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle))
> +                       return -ENODEV;
> +
>                 *type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE;
>                 status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta);
>                 if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> @@ -1916,9 +1961,24 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
>         return result < 0 ? result : 0;
>  }
>
> +static void __init acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(void)
> +{
> +       acpi_status status;
> +       struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr;
> +
> +       status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
> +                               (struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr);
> +       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +               spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address;
> +       else
> +               printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n");
> +}
> +
>  int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>  {
>         int result;
> +       acpi_status status;
> +       struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr;
>
>         acpi_pci_root_init();
>         acpi_pci_link_init();
> @@ -1934,6 +1994,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
>
>         acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler);
>
> +       /*
> +        * If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART
> +        * device in SPCR table.
> +        */
> +       status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0,
> +                               (struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr);
> +       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> +               if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao))
> +                       printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported.");
> +
> +               if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart)
> +                       acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr();
> +       }
> +
>         mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
>         /*
>          * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
> --
> 2.0.4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: [PATCH v11 01/17] Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen

[Stefano Stabellini]

On Mon, 18 Apr 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> wrote:
> > From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> >
> > ACPI 6.0 introduces a new table STAO to list the devices which are used
> > by Xen and can't be used by Dom0. On Xen virtual platforms, the physical
> > UART is used by Xen. So here it hides UART from Dom0.
> >
> > CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> (supporter:ACPI)
> > CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> (supporter:ACPI)
> > CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org (open list:ACPI)
> > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

I am going to commit it to the xentip tree, if you prefer to take it in
your tree please let me know.


> > ---
> >  drivers/acpi/scan.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > index 5f28cf7..cfc73fe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> > @@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_device_lock);
> >  LIST_HEAD(acpi_wakeup_device_list);
> >  static DEFINE_MUTEX(acpi_hp_context_lock);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * The UART device described by the SPCR table is the only object which needs
> > + * special-casing. Everything else is covered by ACPI namespace paths in STAO
> > + * table.
> > + */
> > +static u64 spcr_uart_addr;
> > +
> >  struct acpi_dep_data {
> >         struct list_head node;
> >         acpi_handle master;
> > @@ -1453,6 +1460,41 @@ static int acpi_add_single_object(struct acpi_device **child,
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static acpi_status acpi_get_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares,
> > +                                           void *context)
> > +{
> > +       struct resource *res = context;
> > +
> > +       if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res))
> > +               return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
> > +
> > +       return AE_OK;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool acpi_device_should_be_hidden(acpi_handle handle)
> > +{
> > +       acpi_status status;
> > +       struct resource res;
> > +
> > +       /* Check if it should ignore the UART device */
> > +       if (!(spcr_uart_addr && acpi_has_method(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS)))
> > +               return false;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * The UART device described in SPCR table is assumed to have only one
> > +        * memory resource present. So we only look for the first one here.
> > +        */
> > +       status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> > +                                    acpi_get_resource_memory, &res);
> > +       if (ACPI_FAILURE(status) || res.start != spcr_uart_addr)
> > +               return false;
> > +
> > +       acpi_handle_info(handle, "The UART device @%pa in SPCR table will be hidden\n",
> > +                        &res.start);
> > +
> > +       return true;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
> >                                     unsigned long long *sta)
> >  {
> > @@ -1466,6 +1508,9 @@ static int acpi_bus_type_and_status(acpi_handle handle, int *type,
> >         switch (acpi_type) {
> >         case ACPI_TYPE_ANY:             /* for ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT */
> >         case ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE:
> > +               if (acpi_device_should_be_hidden(handle))
> > +                       return -ENODEV;
> > +
> >                 *type = ACPI_BUS_TYPE_DEVICE;
> >                 status = acpi_bus_get_status_handle(handle, sta);
> >                 if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> > @@ -1916,9 +1961,24 @@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void)
> >         return result < 0 ? result : 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void __init acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(void)
> > +{
> > +       acpi_status status;
> > +       struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr;
> > +
> > +       status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
> > +                               (struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr);
> > +       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> > +               spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address;
> > +       else
> > +               printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n");
> > +}
> > +
> >  int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> >  {
> >         int result;
> > +       acpi_status status;
> > +       struct acpi_table_stao *stao_ptr;
> >
> >         acpi_pci_root_init();
> >         acpi_pci_link_init();
> > @@ -1934,6 +1994,20 @@ int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
> >
> >         acpi_scan_add_handler(&generic_device_handler);
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * If there is STAO table, check whether it needs to ignore the UART
> > +        * device in SPCR table.
> > +        */
> > +       status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_STAO, 0,
> > +                               (struct acpi_table_header **)&stao_ptr);
> > +       if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> > +               if (stao_ptr->header.length > sizeof(struct acpi_table_stao))
> > +                       printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "STAO Name List not yet supported.");
> > +
> > +               if (stao_ptr->ignore_uart)
> > +                       acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr();
> > +       }
> > +
> >         mutex_lock(&acpi_scan_lock);
> >         /*
> >          * Enumerate devices in the ACPI namespace.
> > --
> > 2.0.4
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>