linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>,
	Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>,
	charles.chenxin@huawei.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 19:33:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5718BA81.2070704@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75Vd7eNH546ZUhzkt30Xi_jFpHMn+seLQXLhuvbwC+g7bsA@mail.gmail.com>

在 2016/4/20 21:04, Andy Shevchenko 写道:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:13 AM, Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com> wrote:
>> This patch converts device node to fwnode for dwapb driver, so
>> as to provide a unified fwnode for DT and ACPI bindings.
>>
>> Tested-by: Alan Tull <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com>
>> Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jiang Qiu <qiujiang@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c                | 37 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>>  drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c       |  2 +-
>>  include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> index 772d743..92bc204 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-dwapb.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
>>  #include <linux/of_irq.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/property.h>
>>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>>  #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h>
>>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>> @@ -290,14 +291,14 @@ static void dwapb_configure_irqs(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>>                                  struct dwapb_port_property *pp)
>>  {
>>         struct gpio_chip *gc = &port->gc;
>> -       struct device_node *node = pp->node;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle  *fwnode = pp->fwnode;
>>         struct irq_chip_generic *irq_gc = NULL;
>>         unsigned int hwirq, ngpio = gc->ngpio;
>>         struct irq_chip_type *ct;
>>         int err, i;
>>
>> -       gpio->domain = irq_domain_add_linear(node, ngpio,
>> -                                            &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
>> +       gpio->domain = irq_domain_create_linear(fwnode, ngpio,
>> +                                                &irq_generic_chip_ops, gpio);
>>         if (!gpio->domain)
>>                 return;
>>
>> @@ -415,7 +416,8 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_add_port(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio,
>>         }
>>
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
>> -       port->gc.of_node = pp->node;
>> +       port->gc.of_node = is_of_node(pp->fwnode) ?
>> +               to_of_node(pp->fwnode) : NULL;
> 
> Someone commented on this that it's simple
> …of_node = to_of_node(…);
>
Yes, the to_of_node() function has checked as like above, as follow:

static inline struct device_node *to_of_node(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
{
	return is_of_node(fwnode) ?
		container_of(fwnode, struct device_node, fwnode) : NULL;
}

Next version, I will fixed it.

>>  #endif
>>         port->gc.ngpio = pp->ngpio;
>>         port->gc.base = pp->gpio_base;
>> @@ -447,19 +449,15 @@ static void dwapb_gpio_unregister(struct dwapb_gpio *gpio)
>>  }
>>
>>  static struct dwapb_platform_data *
>> -dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>> +dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(struct device *dev)
>>  {
>> -       struct device_node *node, *port_np;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>>         struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata;
>>         struct dwapb_port_property *pp;
>>         int nports;
>>         int i;
>>
>> -       node = dev->of_node;
>> -       if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) || !node)
>> -               return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> -
>> -       nports = of_get_child_count(node);
>> +       nports = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
>>         if (nports == 0)
>>                 return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>>
>> @@ -474,18 +472,18 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>>         pdata->nports = nports;
>>
>>         i = 0;
>> -       for_each_child_of_node(node, port_np) {
>> +       device_for_each_child_node(dev, fwnode)  {
>>                 pp = &pdata->properties[i++];
>> -               pp->node = port_np;
>> +               pp->fwnode = fwnode;
>>
>> -               if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
>> +               if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "reg", &pp->idx) ||
>>                     pp->idx >= DWAPB_MAX_PORTS) {
>>                         dev_err(dev,
>>                                 "missing/invalid port index for port%d\n", i);
>>                         return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>>                 }
>>
>> -               if (of_property_read_u32(port_np, "snps,nr-gpios",
>> +               if (fwnode_property_read_u32(fwnode, "snps,nr-gpios",
>>                                          &pp->ngpio)) {
>>                         dev_info(dev,
>>                                  "failed to get number of gpios for port%d\n",
>> @@ -497,9 +495,10 @@ dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
>>                  * Only port A can provide interrupts in all configurations of
>>                  * the IP.
>>                  */
>> -               if (pp->idx == 0 &&
>> -                   of_property_read_bool(port_np, "interrupt-controller")) {
>> -                       pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(port_np, 0);
>> +               if (dev->of_node && pp->idx == 0 &&
>> +                       fwnode_property_read_bool(fwnode,
>> +                                                 "interrupt-controller")) {
>> +                       pp->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(to_of_node(fwnode), 0);
>>                         if (!pp->irq)
>>                                 dev_warn(dev, "no irq for port%d\n", pp->idx);
>>                 }
>> @@ -521,7 +520,7 @@ static int dwapb_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>         struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
>>
>>         if (!pdata) {
>> -               pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(dev);
>> +               pdata = dwapb_gpio_get_pdata(dev);
>>                 if (IS_ERR(pdata))
>>                         return PTR_ERR(pdata);
>>         }
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> index a4ef99b..a24b35f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_quark_i2c_gpio.c
>> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static int intel_quark_gpio_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct mfd_cell *cell)
>>                 return -ENOMEM;
>>
>>         /* Set the properties for portA */
>> -       pdata->properties->node         = NULL;
>> +       pdata->properties->fwnode       = NULL;
>>         pdata->properties->idx          = 0;
>>         pdata->properties->ngpio        = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_NGPIO;
>>         pdata->properties->gpio_base    = INTEL_QUARK_MFD_GPIO_BASE;
>> diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> index 955b579..2dc7f4a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/gpio-dwapb.h
>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@
>>  #define GPIO_DW_APB_H
>>
>>  struct dwapb_port_property {
>> -       struct device_node *node;
>> +       struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
>>         unsigned int    idx;
>>         unsigned int    ngpio;
>>         unsigned int    gpio_base;
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
> 
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 11:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20  7:13 [PATCH v9 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20  7:13 ` [PATCH v9 1/3] gpio: dwapb: remove name from dwapb_port_property Jiang Qiu
2016-04-29  9:21   ` Linus Walleij
2016-04-20  7:13 ` [PATCH v9 2/3] gpio: dwapb: convert device node to fwnode Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 13:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-21 11:33     ` Jiang Qiu [this message]
2016-04-20  7:13 ` [PATCH v9 3/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support Jiang Qiu
2016-04-20 13:06 ` [PATCH v9 0/3] gpio: dwapb: add gpio-signaled acpi event support for power button Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-20 16:10   ` Alan Tull
2016-04-21 11:43     ` Jiang Qiu
2016-04-21 11:42   ` Jiang Qiu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5718BA81.2070704@huawei.com \
    --to=qiujiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
    --cc=charles.chenxin@huawei.com \
    --cc=delicious.quinoa@gmail.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=jamie@jamieiles.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).