From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 13:31:07 +0800
Message-ID: <571EFD1B.1070609@linaro.org>
References: <1461116439-22991-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
 <20160425111338.GJ16065@arm.com> <571E4A2A.8070908@caviumnetworks.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <571E4A2A.8070908@caviumnetworks.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, x86@kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>, Robert Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Marc Zyngier <Marc.Zyngier@arm.com>, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devel@acpica.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Richter <rrichter@cavium.com>, David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

Hi Will, David,

On 2016/4/26 0:47, David Daney wrote:
> On 04/25/2016 04:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 06:40:25PM -0700, David Daney wrote:
>>> From: David Daney <david.daney@cavium.com>
>>>
>>> Based on v16 of device-tree NUMA patch set for arm64 [1],this patch
>>> set introduce the ACPI based configuration to provide NUMA
>>> information.
>>>
>>> ACPI 5.1 already introduced NUMA support for ARM64, which can get the
>>> NUMA domain information from SRAT and SLIT table, so parse those two
>>> tables to get mappings from cpu/mem to numa node configuration and
>>> system locality.
>>
>> Whilst I've queued the main NUMA series for arm64, I'd really like to
>> see more movement on the generic header file cleanups that you posted
>> separately:
>>
>> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1456358528-24213-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com
>>
>
> FWIW:  Those patches should still apply.  I am carrying them in my
> development trees, and have not changed them in any way.
>
>>
>> Given that this ACPI series already requires some significant cross-arch
>> interaction (which is actually good!), perhaps extending the clean-up
>> patches to encompass some of the ACPI bits might make sense, and we can
>> get that queued as a pre-requisite.
>
> The cleanup patches you mention above are really independent of the ACPI
> things.  I have applied them both before and after the ACPI patches, and
> both seem to work.  With a quick perusal of the ACPI patches nothing
> jumps out at me as being a candidate for inclusion in the header file
> cleanup series.

I agree. My patch set is ACPI related enablement, cleanups and
consolidations, it would be good to merge as a single patch set
as it's self-contained.

Thanks
Hanjun