From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Daney Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/14] ACPI NUMA support for ARM64 Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 14:08:09 -0700 Message-ID: <57339F39.3040603@caviumnetworks.com> References: <1461780436-27182-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <20160511104032.GA31374@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Will Deacon Cc: Mark Rutland , "linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" , David Daney , Catalin Marinas , Lv Zheng , "H. Peter Anvin" , Frank Rowand , the arch/x86 maintainers , Robert Moore , ACPI Devel Maling List , Ingo Molnar , Grant Likely , Len Brown , Fenghua Yu , Marc Zyngier , Jon Masters , Robert Richter , Rob Herring , David Daney , Thomas Gleixner , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "devel@acpica.org" List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On 05/11/2016 01:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:40 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 02:43:11AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:07 PM, David Daney wrote: >>>> From: David Daney >>>> >>>> Based on git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git >>>> for-next/core branch at commit 643d703d2d2d ("arm64: compat: Check for >>>> AArch32 state") >> >> [...] >> >>>> David Daney (2): >>>> arm64, numa: Cleanup NUMA disabled messages. >>>> acpi, numa, srat: Improve SRAT error detection and add messages. >>>> >>>> Hanjun Guo (11): >>>> acpi, numa: Use pr_fmt() instead of printk >>>> acpi, numa: Replace ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT() with pr_debug() >>>> acpi, numa: remove duplicate NULL check >>>> acpi, numa: move acpi_numa_slit_init() to drivers/acpi/numa.c >>>> arm64, numa: rework numa_add_memblk() >>>> x86, acpi, numa: cleanup acpi_numa_processor_affinity_init() >>>> acpi, numa: move bad_srat() and srat_disabled() to >>>> drivers/acpi/numa.c >>>> acpi, numa: remove unneeded acpi_numa=1 >>>> acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() to >>>> drivers/acpi/numa.c >>>> arm64, acpi, numa: NUMA support based on SRAT and SLIT >>>> acpi, numa: Enable ACPI based NUMA on ARM64 >>>> >>>> Robert Richter (1): >>>> acpi, numa: Move acpi_numa_arch_fixup() to ia64 only >>> >>> I need ACKs from the ARM64 maintainers on patches [6-7/13] and [13-14/14]. >> >> There's also a dependency on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so I've been >> largely ignoring this as far as 4.6 is concerned and was planning to take >> a proper look for 4.7 once the upcoming merge window is out of the way. > > That would be 4.7 and 4.8 respectively I suppose? > > Anyway, Catalin has ACKed all of them except for the [13/14], so > technically I can apply [1-12/14] now and then [13-14/14] can be > applied when they are ready. > > Do you think there will be any problems with merging [6-7/14] into 4.7 > via the ACPI tree? > I would defer to the arm64 maintainers for decisions about the arm64 specific parts of the patch set. That said, many of the arm64 specific patches depend on the arm64 for-next/core branch, so you would have to be careful about merge ordering if you pull these in before the for-next/core branch is merged. Also FWIW, I plan on addressing Catalin's comments about 13/14 and posting a new version of the patch set in the next day or two. Thanks for looking at these, David Daney