From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Nowicki Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 8/9] arm64, pci, acpi: Provide ACPI-specific prerequisites for PCI bus enumeration. Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 11:51:52 +0200 Message-ID: <575001B8.9020107@semihalf.com> References: <1464621262-26770-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <1464621262-26770-9-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <20160602094555.GB13962@red-moon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f53.google.com ([209.85.215.53]:34476 "EHLO mail-lf0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751189AbcFBJv5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2016 05:51:57 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-f53.google.com with SMTP id k98so30328493lfi.1 for ; Thu, 02 Jun 2016 02:51:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160602094555.GB13962@red-moon> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: helgaas@kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, will.deacon@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, rafael@kernel.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, okaya@codeaurora.org, jchandra@broadcom.com, robert.richter@caviumnetworks.com, mw@semihalf.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com, wangyijing@huawei.com, Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com, msalter@redhat.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, jcm@redhat.com, andrea.gallo@linaro.org, dhdang@apm.com, jeremy.linton@arm.com, liudongdong3@huawei.com, cov@codeaurora.org On 02.06.2016 11:45, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 05:14:21PM +0200, Tomasz Nowicki wrote: >> ACPI requires to run acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus while new PCI bus is created. >> This allows to do some ACPI-specific additional configuration, like >> PCI hotplug slot enumeration. In order to fulfill these requirements, >> we implement arch-specific pcibios_{add|remove}_bus calls >> and call acpi_pci_{add|remove}_bus from there. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Nowicki >> --- >> arch/arm64/kernel/pci.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > Is there a reason why this has to be a standalone patch ? No there is no good reason behind this I will squash it with 9. > > It is pretty much useless without patch 9 or I have stared at > this series for too long. Yes, it is useless w/o patch 9. > > Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi > Thanks, Tomasz