Re: [PATCH V2 1/7] coresight: replicator: Move ACPI support from AMBA driver to platform driver

[Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>]

On 12/1/23 18:05, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 01, 2023 at 11:50:47AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> Add support for the dynamic replicator device in the platform driver, which
>> can then be used on ACPI based platforms. This change would now allow
>> runtime power management for repliacator devices on ACPI based systems.
>>
>> The driver would try to enable the APB clock if available. Also, rename the
>> code to reflect the fact that it now handles both static and dynamic
>> replicators.
>>
>> Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> 
> Except the minor nit below which may apply also for few other patches
> in the series
> 
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> # For ACPI related changes
> Tested-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> # Boot and driver probe only
> 
> [...]
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> index b6be73034996..64de0bee02ec 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-replicator.c
>> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ DEFINE_CORESIGHT_DEVLIST(replicator_devs, "replicator");
>>  struct replicator_drvdata {
>>  	void __iomem		*base;
>>  	struct clk		*atclk;
>> +	struct clk		*pclk;
> 
> [minor nit] Perhaps can be documented as well ?

Sure, will add the following comment above the structure.

@pclk:    optional clock for the core parts of the replicator.