From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Linda Knippers Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi, nfit: fix module unload vs workqueue shutdown race Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 19:16:00 -0400 Message-ID: <58F69E30.2040602@hpe.com> References: <149253869300.4222.11825248275497461939.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> <58F68D20.5090607@hpe.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from g2t2352.austin.hpe.com ([15.233.44.25]:11065 "EHLO g2t2352.austin.hpe.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752196AbdDRXQR (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 19:16:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Williams Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , Linux ACPI On 04/18/2017 07:05 PM, Dan Williams wrote: >> It seems a bit better because I can sometimes get a test to complete >> but then I'll get a panic when I try again. > > Some forward progress... let me go back and try your test script on my > bare metal config because this patch only addressed the reliable > failure I was seeing for a single run of "make check". > >> The footprints are the same >> as before, sometimes when unloading the module but sometimes in a kfree >> or related function. >> >> I'd be interested in your .config file and exactly how you're building >> your bare metal kernel. > > Here's the config and build + install steps I'm performing. > > https://gist.github.com/djbw/73946ed4e8623aa1ded1b3615ba6d82b > Thanks, I'll try your config. There are quite a few differences, -- ljk