From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Peter Williams <peter@newton.cx>,
"Dumbre, Saket" <saket.dumbre@intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1] ACPICA: Refuse to evaluate a method if arguments are missing
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 14:17:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5909446.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net> (raw)
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As reported in [1], a platform firmware update that increased the number
of method parameters and forgot to update a least one of its callers,
caused ACPICA to crash due to use-after-free.
Since this a result of a clear AML issue that arguably cannot be fixed
up by the interpreter (it cannot produce missing data out of thin air),
address it by making ACPICA refuse to evaluate a method if the caller
attempts to pass fewer arguments than expected to it.
Closes: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/issues/1027 [1]
Reported-by: Peter Williams <peter@newton.cx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
This is an exception as it fixes a kernel crash on multiple platforms
affected by the defective platform firmware update.
I will take care of submitting an equivalent change to upstream
ACPICA later.
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dsmethod.c
@@ -483,6 +483,13 @@
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NULL_OBJECT);
}
+ if (this_walk_state->num_operands < obj_desc->method.param_count) {
+ ACPI_ERROR((AE_INFO, "Missing argument for method [%4.4s]",
+ acpi_ut_get_node_name(method_node)));
+
+ return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_ARG);
+ }
+
/* Init for new method, possibly wait on method mutex */
status =
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-18 12:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-18 12:17 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2025-06-18 12:21 ` [PATCH v1] ACPICA: Refuse to evaluate a method if arguments are missing Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5909446.DvuYhMxLoT@rjwysocki.net \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=hansg@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@newton.cx \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=saket.dumbre@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox