From: "lihuisong (C)" <lihuisong@huawei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: <lenb@kernel.org>, <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <Sudeep.Holla@arm.com>,
<linuxarm@huawei.com>, <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>,
<zhanjie9@hisilicon.com>, <zhenglifeng1@huawei.com>,
<yubowen8@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Return failure when get lpi_state->arch_flags failed
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 17:59:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5caae4ef-e259-47cc-b0b7-f383dce4a334@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hNj817g=rr8+YTGaeBkkfNuuU7FGuZyyb1j61BMOKTGA@mail.gmail.com>
在 2025/10/22 3:36, Rafael J. Wysocki 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 11:38 AM Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com> wrote:
>> The architecture specific context loss flags is important for ARM.
>> And this flag is used to control the execution of different code
>> flows in acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter().
>>
>> So it is better to return failure when get lpi_state->arch_flags
>> failed.
> A failure means no idle states at all.
Actually, I didn't know why driver should continue to do cpu idle
scaling if the idle state doesn't meet the developer's expectations.🙂
> Wouldn't it be better to skip the state with invalid arch flags?
This arch flags is important. And acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter will use it.
There is no other place to verify its validity. so here do it.
This check is just to prevent potential issues in cpuidle scaling later.
>
>> Fixes: a36a7fecfe60 ("ACPI / processor_idle: Add support for Low Power Idle(LPI) states")
>> Signed-off-by: Huisong Li <lihuisong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 7 +++++--
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> index 681587f2614b..f36f9514b6c7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> @@ -984,8 +984,11 @@ static int acpi_processor_evaluate_lpi(acpi_handle handle,
>> if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 2, &lpi_state->flags))
>> lpi_state->flags = 0;
>>
>> - if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 3, &lpi_state->arch_flags))
>> - lpi_state->arch_flags = 0;
>> + if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 3, &lpi_state->arch_flags)) {
>> + pr_err("Get architecture specific context loss flags failed.\n");
>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>> + goto end;
>> + }
>>
>> if (obj_get_integer(pkg_elem + 4, &lpi_state->res_cnt_freq))
>> lpi_state->res_cnt_freq = 1;
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-23 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-29 9:37 [PATCH v1 0/9] ACPI: processor: idle: enhance and cleancode for cpuidle state Huisong Li
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 1/9] ACPI: processor: idle: raise up log level when evaluate LPI failed Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23 9:09 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 2/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Return failure if entry method is not buffer or integer type Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23 9:25 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-23 10:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24 9:25 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-26 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 3/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Return failure when get lpi_state->arch_flags failed Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:36 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23 9:59 ` lihuisong (C) [this message]
2025-10-23 10:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24 9:27 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 4/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Move the initialization of state->flags to acpi_processor_setup_cstates Huisong Li
2025-10-22 14:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 5/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Add the verification of processor FFH LPI state Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23 10:17 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-23 10:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24 9:40 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-26 12:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-27 1:42 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-27 12:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-28 12:45 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-28 14:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 6/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Do not change power states if get power info failed Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-24 9:10 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-26 12:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-27 3:01 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-10-27 12:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 7/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Remove died codes about the verification of cstate count Huisong Li
2025-10-21 19:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-10-23 10:19 ` lihuisong (C)
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 8/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Redefine setup idle functions to void Huisong Li
2025-09-29 9:37 ` [PATCH v1 9/9] ACPI: processor: idle: Redefine acpi_processor_setup_cpuidle_dev " Huisong Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5caae4ef-e259-47cc-b0b7-f383dce4a334@huawei.com \
--to=lihuisong@huawei.com \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=yubowen8@huawei.com \
--cc=zhanjie9@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox