From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="OKEHYoXS" Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C39A9C for ; Sat, 2 Dec 2023 04:43:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1701520998; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=h4DJq4T+U4J3l6LPK0uojmAyF6LfoimHRqrF4QgIogY=; b=OKEHYoXSRhDkPNBwOtE/s+9Cez9NGZIjpKPk/7dvosdaftNhFGbWiJ5nxkQmet94Q8783E Yn1hc35P++Z7CWksuPxwPqD0BvMNHIKnCHfJ5XDKlSnaLrXd+M52IMc+6bvgm+c1jfzPPn eIOmiyuEseT+sopcbhoHuKTzfdNOnwc= Received: from mail-ej1-f70.google.com (mail-ej1-f70.google.com [209.85.218.70]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-73-tl7W2rPjOAK6_1eUU2ktdw-1; Sat, 02 Dec 2023 07:43:15 -0500 X-MC-Unique: tl7W2rPjOAK6_1eUU2ktdw-1 Received: by mail-ej1-f70.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a114f099bebso271446366b.2 for ; Sat, 02 Dec 2023 04:43:15 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1701520994; x=1702125794; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=h4DJq4T+U4J3l6LPK0uojmAyF6LfoimHRqrF4QgIogY=; b=qdISrhkVMkW1krGFbchCEssVyE3HSbcHd3xtH9dQ4clbMS7DIpE7cCbT8ilgZLIasg hTDao9rKK+4TOHnsamq3A1qk7lkdGOmg8CDkUDbtgxzSiNLTR37Vs1sGUAXbLFS/JSKm D8rx11nuVPOQ+vxSGszFe/pFDGx80HUIO0DR3/DJMyCt8rBx7mCH8iQr5ZvkO7Xub9NE fD05SSu2X9Rv6MHUGl4IBcDH+zYNANxFLNQmbH8qC9UcSWzJj91MttJV6b1Y8WiqCq7o di6YNW++aU2nvah/V3fdprMwtlRX29aBLW+EFKgtLMbbjdTfDve6PFRUbFeGXR5Zwz5L b//Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz6woipnOedy+PvCMyro6duerNdzuxpB7ZZz6/zIV4ng5XkLtPc D+4L6Mlm87/GmyPmuuotOWMD/bUWhhj1z55W9clnXEIddV0M3d8Vd0x2Jy0Qn3iQk/SFEDDsTXL OjtkoewlbDCkHdSaYvnTVRA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d295:b0:a19:a19b:55f6 with SMTP id ay21-20020a170906d29500b00a19a19b55f6mr1716432ejb.134.1701520994694; Sat, 02 Dec 2023 04:43:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEkw8ECvyYB005RuSFu+FKenCisiOosr0lIXRvYlHHyXKgGxBCWlDX8Hlv33kA9TEyha+zm5A== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d295:b0:a19:a19b:55f6 with SMTP id ay21-20020a170906d29500b00a19a19b55f6mr1716421ejb.134.1701520994397; Sat, 02 Dec 2023 04:43:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPV6:2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec? (2001-1c00-0c32-7800-5bfa-a036-83f0-f9ec.cable.dynamic.v6.ziggo.nl. [2001:1c00:c32:7800:5bfa:a036:83f0:f9ec]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m25-20020a170906235900b009fcb10eecb2sm2985850eja.84.2023.12.02.04.43.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 02 Dec 2023 04:43:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <61ef73e6-e633-47e1-b599-ee66aa179227@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2023 13:43:13 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: OSL: acpi_os_execute() improvements Content-Language: en-US, nl To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ACPI Cc: LKML , Zhang Rui , Srinivas Pandruvada , Michal Wilczynski , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Heikki Krogerus , Mario Limonciello References: <3281896.aeNJFYEL58@kreacher> From: Hans de Goede In-Reply-To: <3281896.aeNJFYEL58@kreacher> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, On 11/29/23 14:45, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > This series improves acpi_os_execute() on top of > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-acpi/patch/5745568.DvuYhMxLoT@kreacher/ > > but only the last patch really depends on it. > > The first two patches clean up the code somewhat and the third one modifies > the function to allow Notify () handlers to run on all CPUs (not on CPU0 only). > > The last patch changes it to use GFP_KERNEL for memory allocations, as it does > not run in interrupt context any more after the change linked above. I have added this series, as well as the preceding "ACPI: OSL: Use a threaded interrupt handler for SCI" patch to my personal tree now, so that it will get tested on various devices when I run my personal tree on them. I'll let you know if I hit any issues caused by this series. Regards, Hans