From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Cc: "Karol Herbst" <kherbst@redhat.com>,
"Lyude Paul" <lyude@redhat.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@redhat.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
"Xinhui Pan" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>, "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>,
"Maciej W . Rozycki" <macro@orcam.me.uk>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR NVIDIA GEFORCE/QUADRO GPUS"
<nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS"
<amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] PCI: Split up some logic in pcie_bandwidth_available() to separate function
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 15:02:11 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <671f5c3b-fd24-7d24-c848-1ae31cea82ff@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231114200755.14911-7-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3095 bytes --]
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The logic to calculate bandwidth limits may be used at multiple call sites
> so split it up into its own static function instead.
>
> No intended functional changes.
>
> Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> v2->v3:
> * Split from previous patch version
> ---
> drivers/pci/pci.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> index 55bc3576a985..0ff7883cc774 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@ -6224,6 +6224,38 @@ int pcie_set_mps(struct pci_dev *dev, int mps)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcie_set_mps);
>
> +static u32 pcie_calc_bw_limits(struct pci_dev *dev, u32 bw,
> + struct pci_dev **limiting_dev,
> + enum pci_bus_speed *speed,
> + enum pcie_link_width *width)
> +{
> + enum pcie_link_width next_width;
> + enum pci_bus_speed next_speed;
> + u32 next_bw;
> + u16 lnksta;
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnksta);
> +
> + next_speed = pcie_link_speed[FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS, lnksta)];
> + next_width = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW, lnksta);
> +
> + next_bw = next_width * PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC(next_speed);
> +
> + /* Check if current device limits the total bandwidth */
I'd make this a function comment instead and say:
/* Check if @dev limits the total bandwidth. */
Other than that,
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
--
i.
> + if (!bw || next_bw <= bw) {
> + bw = next_bw;
> +
> + if (limiting_dev)
> + *limiting_dev = dev;
> + if (speed)
> + *speed = next_speed;
> + if (width)
> + *width = next_width;
> + }
> +
> + return bw;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * pcie_bandwidth_available - determine minimum link settings of a PCIe
> * device and its bandwidth limitation
> @@ -6242,39 +6274,15 @@ u32 pcie_bandwidth_available(struct pci_dev *dev, struct pci_dev **limiting_dev,
> enum pci_bus_speed *speed,
> enum pcie_link_width *width)
> {
> - u16 lnksta;
> - enum pci_bus_speed next_speed;
> - enum pcie_link_width next_width;
> - u32 bw, next_bw;
> + u32 bw = 0;
>
> if (speed)
> *speed = PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN;
> if (width)
> *width = PCIE_LNK_WIDTH_UNKNOWN;
>
> - bw = 0;
> -
> while (dev) {
> - pcie_capability_read_word(dev, PCI_EXP_LNKSTA, &lnksta);
> -
> - next_speed = pcie_link_speed[FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS,
> - lnksta)];
> - next_width = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW, lnksta);
> -
> - next_bw = next_width * PCIE_SPEED2MBS_ENC(next_speed);
> -
> - /* Check if current device limits the total bandwidth */
> - if (!bw || next_bw <= bw) {
> - bw = next_bw;
> -
> - if (limiting_dev)
> - *limiting_dev = dev;
> - if (speed)
> - *speed = next_speed;
> - if (width)
> - *width = next_width;
> - }
> -
> + bw = pcie_calc_bw_limits(dev, bw, limiting_dev, speed, width);
> dev = pci_upstream_bridge(dev);
> }
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-16 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-14 20:07 [PATCH v3 0/7] Improvements to pcie_bandwidth_available() for eGPUs Mario Limonciello
2023-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] drm/nouveau: Switch from pci_is_thunderbolt_attached() to dev_is_removable() Mario Limonciello
2023-11-16 12:50 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] drm/radeon: " Mario Limonciello
2023-11-15 9:27 ` Christian König
2023-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] PCI: Drop pci_is_thunderbolt_attached() Mario Limonciello
2023-11-16 12:51 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] PCI: pciehp: Move check for is_thunderbolt into a quirk Mario Limonciello
2023-11-16 12:30 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2023-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] PCI: ACPI: Detect PCIe root ports that are used for tunneling Mario Limonciello
2023-11-15 10:40 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-11-15 17:08 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-11-16 9:00 ` Mika Westerberg
2023-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] PCI: Split up some logic in pcie_bandwidth_available() to separate function Mario Limonciello
2023-11-16 13:02 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2023-11-14 20:07 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] PCI: Exclude PCIe ports used for virtual links in pcie_bandwidth_available() Mario Limonciello
2023-11-15 3:23 ` Lazar, Lijo
2023-11-15 17:04 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-11-15 21:09 ` Mario Limonciello
2023-11-16 4:33 ` Lazar, Lijo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=671f5c3b-fd24-7d24-c848-1ae31cea82ff@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Xinhui.Pan@amd.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dakr@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kherbst@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=lyude@redhat.com \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=pali@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox