From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: add "auto" to acpi_enforce_resources
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:39:29 +0100
Message-ID: <68676e00903240539i119b6d26j516ee131d4cd6781@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902040042570.9833@localhost.localdomain>
	 <498953DF.5050306@redhat.com> <20090204131708.GA2739@srcf.ucam.org>
	 <20090204142606.1823661b@hyperion.delvare>
	 <20090204142015.GB3923@srcf.ucam.org>
	 <20090210145716.105ab58b@hyperion.delvare>
	 <20090210140829.GA25397@srcf.ucam.org> <49919E08.5050002@redhat.com>
	 <20090210172408.400cacee@hyperion.delvare>
	 <20090227132740.GF1482@ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f158.google.com ([209.85.220.158]:57183 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f158.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751645AbZCXMjc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:39:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20090227132740.GF1482@ucw.cz>
Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Thomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de>, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>

On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> > For the record we have changed the default to strict in Fedora's
>> > development branch, for 2 weeks or so now, including in the recently
>> > released Fedora 11 release and we've had 0 complaints so far.
>>
>> Well, if the number of affected systems is small, this is good news.
>> But this is only 2 weeks and one distribution, coverage isn't
>> sufficient to claim anything yet IMHO.
>>
>> That being said... if there's a common consensus that switching to
>> strict and dealing with fallouts is the best thing to do, and I'm the
>> only one objecting to this, then I am ready to admit that I was wrong
>> and let you proceed.
>
> I believe that 'enable strict, deal with fallout' is the best
> long-term strategy...

Hello,
the merge window for .30 is now open, what are we going to do with this issue?

Luca