From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3843F31D392; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 16:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758298246; cv=none; b=MZKsO5Hti8cNY4EOytWg+DDP9tlk676gc/I7EhbXnBGNRlZUhiLtkzVXLEaw+cXzMqBa3F+cqqIX7V67l2f1OGtTiGawdwXlIcOsJtaEg/EK8FzVPTLrxHQsY4XDZewKGPng3LS7toMbK+FhLn1vXX0HgqlWzdYCqXwQ2C0RCgU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758298246; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TtjQbcOJxvG112VTPz6mC99j+hDDQQpWHHiN1bCSSSw=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=GHyv18fO31aHCLi/cKdE5FbZANd29lNdUVbAhQlmTeEtQKCCeCOs3oM+AyzpvEAqz2yUA1NMZ8oVbEGF1369RmBFsI5PN/s3YhB6fxz9xrpZQYKbUIVHOkurW1FBEap9MYN74Xsj2c/vD4SFqdSdze6EndlqG6Y3v87JiywkZJo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.140.110.172 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=arm.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B271BA8; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 09:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.1.197.69] (eglon.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.69]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 708A13F66E; Fri, 19 Sep 2025 09:10:39 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <6892215f-1ed3-4fd4-8546-8fd0aa8783b5@arm.com> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:10:39 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/29] ACPI / PPTT: Stop acpi_count_levels() expecting callers to clear levels To: Ben Horgan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Cc: D Scott Phillips OS , carl@os.amperecomputing.com, lcherian@marvell.com, bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com, tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com, baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com, Jamie Iles , Xin Hao , peternewman@google.com, dfustini@baylibre.com, amitsinght@marvell.com, David Hildenbrand , Dave Martin , Koba Ko , Shanker Donthineni , fenghuay@nvidia.com, baisheng.gao@unisoc.com, Jonathan Cameron , Rob Herring , Rohit Mathew , Rafael Wysocki , Len Brown , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Danilo Krummrich References: <20250910204309.20751-1-james.morse@arm.com> <20250910204309.20751-3-james.morse@arm.com> <8b502a2a-36f0-4234-84a0-e1d00b95ba56@arm.com> Content-Language: en-GB From: James Morse In-Reply-To: <8b502a2a-36f0-4234-84a0-e1d00b95ba56@arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Ben, On 11/09/2025 15:08, Ben Horgan wrote: > On 9/10/25 21:42, James Morse wrote: >> In acpi_count_levels(), the initial value of *levels passed by the >> caller is really an implementation detail of acpi_count_levels(), so it >> is unreasonable to expect the callers of this function to know what to >> pass in for this parameter. The only sensible initial value is 0, >> which is what the only upstream caller (acpi_get_cache_info()) passes. >> >> Use a local variable for the starting cache level in acpi_count_levels(), >> and pass the result back to the caller via the function return value. >> >> Gid rid of the levels parameter, which has no remaining purpose. > > Nit: s/Gid/Get/ Oops, Thanks, James