From: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@linux.intel.com>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "open list:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS"
<platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the suspend process
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2022 08:35:26 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b33269731e04c25f8766261db75dcb5e5bb60f2.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220310151705.577442-3-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 09:17 -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> The `OS_HINT` message is supposed to indicate that everything else
> that is supposed to go into the deepest state has done so.
>
> This assumption is invalid as:
> 1) The CPUs will still go in and out of the deepest state
> 2) Other devices may still run their `noirq` suspend routines
> 3) The LPS0 ACPI device will still run
Yep. We had looked at adding a notifier to address this.
David
>
> To more closely mirror how this works on other operating systems,
> move the `amd-pmc` suspend to the very last thing before the s2idle
> loop via an lps0 callback.
>
> Fixes: 8d89835b0467 ("PM: suspend: Do not pause cpuidle in the suspend-to-idle
> path")
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> index 971aaabaa9c8..c13fd93f2662 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd-pmc.c
> @@ -639,9 +639,9 @@ static int amd_pmc_verify_czn_rtc(struct amd_pmc_dev
> *pdev, u32 *arg)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +static int amd_pmc_suspend(void *context, bool constraints_met)
> {
> - struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev = dev_get_drvdata((struct device *)context);
> int rc;
> u8 msg;
> u32 arg = 1;
> @@ -658,7 +658,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_suspend(struct device
> *dev)
> }
>
> /* Dump the IdleMask before we send hint to SMU */
> - amd_pmc_idlemask_read(pdev, dev, NULL);
> + amd_pmc_idlemask_read(pdev, pdev->dev, NULL);
> msg = amd_pmc_get_os_hint(pdev);
> rc = amd_pmc_send_cmd(pdev, arg, NULL, msg, 0);
> if (rc) {
> @@ -681,28 +681,28 @@ static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_suspend(struct device
> *dev)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static void amd_pmc_resume(void *context)
> {
> - struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct amd_pmc_dev *pdev = dev_get_drvdata((struct device *)context);
> int rc;
> u8 msg;
>
> msg = amd_pmc_get_os_hint(pdev);
> rc = amd_pmc_send_cmd(pdev, 0, NULL, msg, 0);
> if (rc)
> - dev_err(pdev->dev, "resume failed\n");
> + dev_err(pdev->dev, "resume failed: %d\n", rc);
>
> /* Let SMU know that we are looking for stats */
> amd_pmc_send_cmd(pdev, 0, NULL, SMU_MSG_LOG_DUMP_DATA, 0);
>
> /* Dump the IdleMask to see the blockers */
> - amd_pmc_idlemask_read(pdev, dev, NULL);
> + amd_pmc_idlemask_read(pdev, pdev->dev, NULL);
>
> /* Write data incremented by 1 to distinguish in stb_read */
> if (enable_stb)
> rc = amd_pmc_write_stb(pdev, AMD_PMC_STB_PREDEF + 1);
> if (rc)
> - dev_err(pdev->dev, "error writing to STB\n");
> + dev_err(pdev->dev, "error writing to STB: %d\n", rc);
>
> /* Restore the QoS request back to defaults if it was set */
> if (pdev->cpu_id == AMD_CPU_ID_CZN)
> @@ -711,15 +711,8 @@ static int __maybe_unused amd_pmc_resume(struct device
> *dev)
>
> /* Notify on failed entry */
> amd_pmc_validate_deepest(pdev);
> -
> - return rc;
> }
>
> -static const struct dev_pm_ops amd_pmc_pm_ops = {
> - .suspend_noirq = amd_pmc_suspend,
> - .resume_noirq = amd_pmc_resume,
> -};
> -
> static const struct pci_device_id pmc_pci_ids[] = {
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, AMD_CPU_ID_YC) },
> { PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, AMD_CPU_ID_CZN) },
> @@ -884,6 +877,12 @@ static int amd_pmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> amd_pmc_get_smu_version(dev);
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
> + err = acpi_register_lps0_callbacks(amd_pmc_suspend,
> + amd_pmc_resume,
> + &pdev->dev);
> + if (err)
> + goto err_pci_dev_put;
> +
> amd_pmc_dbgfs_register(dev);
> cpu_latency_qos_add_request(&dev->amd_pmc_pm_qos_req,
> PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE);
> return 0;
> @@ -897,6 +896,9 @@ static int amd_pmc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct amd_pmc_dev *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> + acpi_unregister_lps0_callbacks(amd_pmc_suspend,
> + amd_pmc_resume,
> + &pdev->dev);
> amd_pmc_dbgfs_unregister(dev);
> pci_dev_put(dev->rdev);
> mutex_destroy(&dev->lock);
> @@ -917,7 +919,6 @@ static struct platform_driver amd_pmc_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "amd_pmc",
> .acpi_match_table = amd_pmc_acpi_ids,
> - .pm = &amd_pmc_pm_ops,
> },
> .probe = amd_pmc_probe,
> .remove = amd_pmc_remove,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-10 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-10 15:17 [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / x86: Add support for LPS0 callback handler Mario Limonciello
2022-03-10 15:17 ` [PATCH 2/4] ACPI / x86: Pass the constraints checking result to LPS0 callback Mario Limonciello
2022-03-10 16:26 ` David E. Box
2022-03-10 16:29 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-03-10 15:17 ` [PATCH 3/4] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Move to later in the suspend process Mario Limonciello
2022-03-10 16:35 ` David E. Box [this message]
2022-03-10 15:17 ` [PATCH 4/4] platform/x86: amd-pmc: Drop CPU QoS workaround Mario Limonciello
2022-03-10 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/4] ACPI / x86: Add support for LPS0 callback handler David E. Box
2022-03-10 16:13 ` Limonciello, Mario
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b33269731e04c25f8766261db75dcb5e5bb60f2.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=david.e.box@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mgross@linux.intel.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox