From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: "Sohil Mehta" <sohil.mehta@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Jürgen Gross" <jgross@suse.com>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
David Laight <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 13/15] x86/cpu/intel: Bound the non-architectural constant_tsc model checks
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2025 14:15:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f05a6849fb7b22db35216dcf12bf537f8a43a92.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250219184133.816753-14-sohil.mehta@intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3876 bytes --]
On Wed, 2025-02-19 at 18:41 +0000, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC is a Linux-defined, synthesized feature flag.
> It is used across several vendors. Intel CPUs will set the feature when
> the architectural CPUID.80000007.EDX[1] bit is set. There are also some
> Intel CPUs that have the X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC behavior but don't
> enumerate it with the architectural bit. Those currently have a model
> range check.
>
> Today, virtually all of the CPUs that have the CPUID bit *also* match
> the "model >= 0x0e" check. This is confusing. Instead of an open-ended
> check, pick some models (INTEL_IVYBRIDGE and P4_WILLAMETTE) as the end
> of goofy CPUs that should enumerate the bit but don't. These models are
> relatively arbitrary but conservative pick for this.
>
> This makes it obvious that later CPUs (like Family 18+) no longer need
> to synthesize X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
> ---
> v3: Make the non-architectural model checks more explicit.
> Improve commit message.
>
> v2: No change.
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> index fc68561d9f92..4fbc5465ca67 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c
> @@ -210,10 +210,6 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> {
> u64 misc_enable;
>
> - if ((c->x86 == 0xf && c->x86_model >= 0x03) ||
> - (c->x86 == 0x6 && c->x86_model >= 0x0e))
> - set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> -
> if (c->x86 >= 6 && !cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IA64))
> c->microcode = intel_get_microcode_revision();
>
> @@ -266,10 +262,16 @@ static void early_init_intel(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> *
> * It is also reliable across cores and sockets. (but not across
> * cabinets - we turn it off in that case explicitly.)
> + *
> + * Use a model-specific check for some older CPUs that have invariant
> + * TSC but may not report it architecturally via 8000_0007.
> */
> if (c->x86_power & (1 << 8)) {
> set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_NONSTOP_TSC);
> + } else if ((c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_P4_PRESCOTT && c->x86_vfm <= INTEL_P4_WILLAMETTE) ||
> + (c->x86_vfm >= INTEL_CORE_YONAH && c->x86_vfm <= INTEL_IVYBRIDGE)) {
> + set_cpu_cap(c, X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC);
> }
>
> /* Penwell and Cloverview have the TSC which doesn't sleep on S3 */
Hm. My test host is INTEL_HASWELL_X (0x63f). For reasons which are
unclear to me, QEMU doesn't set bit 8 of 0x80000007 EDX unless I
explicitly append ',+invtsc' to the existing '-cpu host' on its command
line. So now my guest doesn't think it has X86_FEATURE_CONSTANT_TSC.
For reasons I also don't understand, for a Xen (in qemu/kvm) guest this
results in about a four-second delay when bringing up each vCPU.
Timestamps added to QEMU's stdout because the kernel's own timestamps
are lying...
1755781767: [ 0.489434] smp: Bringing up secondary CPUs ...
1755781767: [ 0.489434] installing Xen timer for CPU 1
1755781767: [ 0.489434] smpboot: x86: Booting SMP configuration:
1755781767: [ 0.489434] .... node #0, CPUs: #1
1755781767: [ 0.489434] installing Xen timer for CPU 2
1755781767: [ 0.489434] #2
1755781767: [ 0.489434] installing Xen timer for CPU 3
1755781767: [ 0.489434] #3
1755781771: [ 0.489434] cpu 1 spinlock event irq 45
1755781775: [ 0.544262] cpu 2 spinlock event irq 46
1755781779: [ 0.604306] cpu 3 spinlock event irq 47
1755781779: [ 0.604792] smp: Brought up 1 node, 4 CPUs
1755781779: [ 0.604792] smpboot: Total of 4 processors activated (1034118.38 BogoMIPS)
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5069 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-21 13:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-19 18:41 [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 01/15] x86/apic: Fix 32-bit APIC initialization for extended Intel Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 02/15] x86/cpu/intel: Fix the movsl alignment preference for extended Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 03/15] x86/microcode: Update the Intel processor flag scan check Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 04/15] x86/mtrr: Modify a x86_model check to an Intel VFM check Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 05/15] x86/cpu/intel: Replace early Family 6 checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 06/15] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 15 " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 07/15] x86/cpu/intel: Replace Family 5 model " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 08/15] x86/acpi/cstate: Improve Intel Family model checks Sohil Mehta
2025-02-20 19:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 09/15] x86/smpboot: Remove confusing quirk usage in INIT delay Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 10/15] x86/smpboot: Fix INIT delay assignment for extended Intel Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 11/15] x86/cpu/intel: Fix fast string initialization for extended Families Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 12/15] x86/pat: Replace Intel x86_model checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 13/15] x86/cpu/intel: Bound the non-architectural constant_tsc model checks Sohil Mehta
2025-08-21 13:15 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2025-08-21 19:34 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-21 19:43 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-08-21 20:09 ` David Woodhouse
2025-08-22 1:46 ` Xiaoyao Li
2025-08-24 22:39 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 14/15] perf/x86: Simplify Intel PMU initialization Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 20:10 ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-19 20:31 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 20:45 ` Liang, Kan
2025-02-27 0:16 ` [PATCH v3.1 " Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 18:41 ` [PATCH v3 15/15] perf/x86/p4: Replace Pentium 4 model checks with VFM ones Sohil Mehta
2025-02-19 20:11 ` Liang, Kan
2025-03-17 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] Prepare for new Intel Family numbers Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 18:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-18 19:10 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-18 20:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-19 15:53 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-19 19:46 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f05a6849fb7b22db35216dcf12bf537f8a43a92.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).