From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
"Mikkola, Jarkko" <jarkko.mikkola@linux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
linux-acpi <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state breaks PWM on Baytrail
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 16:15:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6f19cff9-f367-248e-0c5e-9e6ce9587281@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1498570916.22624.194.camel@linux.intel.com>
Hi,
On 06/27/2017 03:41 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> +Cc: Jarkko and Ulf (they are discussing patch series regarding to I2C
> and ACPI LPSS as well)
Hmm, do you have a link to this patch series?
> +Cc: Mika, he might have a sight on this as well.
I've added everyone in me reply to your first reply, but Jarkko's
email address seems to not work.
Regards,
Hans
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-27 at 16:29 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 11:31 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>> Hi Andy, et al.,
>>>
>>> I've spend quite some time this weekend debugging an issue
>>> an a Bay Trail laptop with a Crystal Cove PMIC which uses
>>> the LPSS PWM for backlight control rather then the PMIC's
>>> PWM.
>>>
>>> The problem is lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state. Specifically when
>>> called when the PWM runtime-suspends during i915 driver load,
>>> during which the i915 driver disables then re-enables the PWM.
>>>
>>> This is the only time (including normal suspend(to-idle)
>>> and resume) when this check:
>>>
>>> pmc_status = (~(d3_sts_0 | func_dis)) & pmc_mask;
>>> if (pmc_status)
>>> goto exit;
>>>
>>> Does not hit the goto exit path
>>
>> ...meaning all LPSS devices (except maybe DMA) are in D3hot.
>>
>>> and lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state
>>> actually executes these 3 statements:
>>>
>>> iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO1, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
>>> LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
>>>
>>> iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO2, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
>>> LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
>>>
>>> iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIOEP, MBI_CR_WRITE,
>>> LPSS_IOSF_GPIODEF0, value1, mask1);
>>>
>>> If I comment out these 3 statements then everything works fine,
>>> with these 3 statements in place though, then the PWM controller
>>> gets stuck when the i915 driver tries to re-enable it (and it
>>> runtime-resumes). After these 3 statements have been run once
>>> then any subsequent reads from the PWM's control register
>>> always return 0x00010000 and writes seem to be ignored.
>>
>> Sounds like powered off LPSS power island.
>>
>>> Given the past troubles with the LPSS DMA controller suspend,
>>> see all the links in this commit message (which introduces
>>> the current fix) :
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/c
>>> om
>>> mit/?id=eebb3e8d8aaf2
>>>
>>> I'm tempted to just rip out lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state,
>>> especially since it does not seem to do anything other
>>> then during early boot when not all drivers are loaded yet.
>>
>> Interesting...
>>
>> You are telling that there is guaranteed that at least one LPSS device
>> (except DMA) will be on at any time?
>>
>>> Note that on Bay Trail devices with an AXP288 PMIC (most new
>>> Bay Trail devices) and on any Cherry Trail device the LPSS I2C
>>> controller connected to the PMIC will never suspend because
>>> some DSTDs make ACPI OpRegion calls during late suspend /
>>> early resume and as such we need to keep the I2C bus alive
>>> the whole time. This means that the check in
>>> lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state will always hit the goto exit path
>>> on these devices,
>>
>> Looks like an answer to the previous question.
>>
>>> leaving just (older) Bay Trail + non AXP288
>>> PMIC devices as potentially hitting the code path where
>>> lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state actually does something and these are
>>> exactly the devices with which people are having a lot of
>>> problems with freezes / hangs.
>>>
>>> So I believe that the best approach would be to simply remove
>>> lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state. Which leaves me wondering what it
>>> actually does. It would be nice for the future if undocumented
>>> (not publicly documented) registers are used that some comments
>>> are added describing what each register write actually does.
>>
>> Do the commit messages describe this enough along with several
>> comments
>> inside acpi_lpss.c?
>>
>>> These seem to simply put the DMA controller into D3:
>>>
>>> u32 value2 = LPSS_PMCSR_D3hot;
>>> u32 mask2 = LPSS_PMCSR_Dx_MASK;
>>>
>>> iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO1, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
>>> LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
>>>
>>> iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIO2, MBI_CFG_WRITE,
>>> LPSS_IOSF_PMCSR, value2, mask2);
>>
>> It overrides the lines which propagate clock and reset signals to the
>> entire LPSS islands.
>>
>> DMA just happened to be a function 0 (in terms of PCI), so, if it is
>> off
>> the rest of the functions can not be on.
>>
>>> But what does this one do? :
>>>
>>> u32 value1 = 0;
>>> u32 mask1 = LPSS_GPIODEF0_DMA_D3_MASK |
>>> LPSS_GPIODEF0_DMA_LLP;
>>
>> (this one is a chicken bit to enable hardware linked list transfers on
>> DMA)
>>
>>>
>>> iosf_mbi_modify(LPSS_IOSF_UNIT_LPIOEP, MBI_CR_WRITE,
>>> LPSS_IOSF_GPIODEF0, value1, mask1);
>>>
>>> I guess this turns on(?) the automatically down powering of the
>>> DMA controllers ? If so then why not just do only that ?
>>
>> No, automatic power gating is a *hardware* (PMC firmware? I do not
>> remember details now) feature which is overridden by the code above.
>>
>> It's something like logical gates where one of the input is what we
>> supply through these chicken bits.
>>
>>> And if this turns it on
>>> then lpss_iosf_exit_d3_state turns the
>>> automagic off, if that is true,
>>
>> The proper wording here I suppose *it allows or forbids the automatic
>> power gating*. It's one layer up I would say. It means it might be a
>> latency between writing these bits and actual hardware response on
>> them.
>>
>>> then there is an ordering issue.
>>> lpss_iosf_exit_d3_state gets only run on (runtime)resume, not
>>> on the initial probe of LPSS devices, so that would mean that
>>> between
>>> the initial probe and the first resume we have the undesirable
>>> auto-off feature active ?
>>
>> Looks like ACPI PM for LPSS should take care of this at probe. When I
>> wrote the code I was assuming that ACPI enumerated devices are runtime
>> powered on during ->probe(). For such I did explicit calls in DMA
>> driver: bb32baf76e56 ("dmaengine: dw: enable runtime PM").
>>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-27 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-26 9:31 lpss_iosf_enter_d3_state breaks PWM on Baytrail Hans de Goede
2017-06-27 13:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-27 13:41 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-27 14:15 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-06-27 14:31 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-06-27 13:54 ` Hans de Goede
2017-07-06 19:14 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6f19cff9-f367-248e-0c5e-9e6ce9587281@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jarkko.mikkola@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).