Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: Disable D3cold on Asus B1400 PCI-NVMe bridge

[Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>]

On 2/19/2024 05:35, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 9, 2024 at 9:36 AM Daniel Drake <drake@endlessos.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 5:57 PM David E. Box <david.e.box@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>> This does look like a firmware bug. We've had reports of D3cold support missing
>>> when running in non-VMD mode on systems that were designed with VMD for Windows.
>>> These issues have been caught and addressed by OEMs during enabling of Linux
>>> systems. Does D3cold work in VMD mode?
>>
>> On Windows for the VMD=on case, we only tested this on a BIOS with
>> StorageD3Enable=0. The NVMe device and parent bridge stayed in D0 over
>> suspend, but that's exactly what the BIOS asked for, so it doesn't
>> really answer your question.
> 
> Tested on the original BIOS version with VMD=on: Windows leaves the
> NVMe device (and parent bridge) in D0 during suspend (i.e. same result
> as VMD=off).
> 
> On this setup, there are 2 devices with StorageD3Enable flags:
> 
> 1. \_SB.PC00.PEG0.PEGP._DSD has StorageD3Enable=1. This is set
> regardless of the VMD setting at the BIOS level. This is the flag that
> is causing us the headache in non-VMD mode where Linux then proceeds
> to put devices into D3cold.
> This PEGP device in the non-VMD configuration corresponds to the NVMe
> storage device. PEG0 is the PCI root port at 00:06.0 (the one in
> question in this thread), and PEGP is the child with address 0.
> However in VMD mode, 00:06.0 is a dummy device (not a bridge) so this
> PEGP device isn't going to be used by anything.
> 
> 2. \_SB.PC00.VMD0._DSD has StorageD3Enable=0. This VMD0 device is only
> present when VMD is enabled in the BIOS. It is the companion for
> 00:0e.0 which is the device that the vmd driver binds against. This
> could be influencing Windows to leave the NVMe device in D0, but I
> doubt it, because it can't explain why Windows would have the D0
> behaviour when VMD=off, also this is a really strange place to put the
> StorageD3Enable setting because it is not a storage device.
> 
>> On Linux with VMD=on and StorageD3Enable=1, the NVMe storage device
>> and the VMD parent bridge are staying in D0 over suspend. I don't know
>> why this is, I would have expected at least D3hot.  However, given
>> that the NVMe device has no firmware_node under the VMD=on setup, I
>> believe there is no way it would enter D3cold because there's no
>> linkage to an ACPI device, so no available _PS3 or _PR0 or whatever is
>> the precise definition of D3cold.
> 
> Checked in more detail. In Linux, the NVMe device will only go into
> D3hot/D3cold if the ACPI companion device has an explicit
> StorageD3Enable=1. However, in VMD mode the NVMe storage device has no
> ACPI companion. Code flow is nvme_pci_alloc_dev() -> acpi_storage_d3()
>   -> return false because no companion.
> 
> The VMD PCI bridge at 10000:e0:06.0 that is parent of the SATA & NVME
> devices does have a companion \_SB.PC00.VMD0.PEG0
> However, the SATA and NVME child devices do not have any ACPI
> companion. I examined the logic of vmd_acpi_find_companion() and
> determined that it is looking for devices with _ADR 80b8ffff (SATA)
> and 8100ffff (NVME) and such devices do not exist in the ACPI tables.
> 
> Speculating a little, I guess this is also why Windows leaves the
> device in D0 in VMD=on mode: it would only put the NVMe device in
> D3hot/D3cold if it had a corresponding companion with
> StorageD3Enable=1 and there isn't one of those. What's still unknown
> is why it doesn't put the device in D3 in VMD=off mode because there
> is a correctly placed StorageD3Enable=1 in that case.
> 
> Daniel

Tangentially related, I've observed from multiple bug reports that 
Windows will apply StorageD3Enable behavior to all storage devices in 
the system even if "only one" has the property.  I would speculate that 
the logic for Windows exists specifically in the Microsoft storage 
drivers but is a "global boolean" for those drivers.  So perhaps when 
VMD is enabled the Intel VMD driver is used instead of the Microsoft 
storage driver so it doesn't have that logic.