public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Gabriele Paoloni <gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com>
Cc: "Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	"Wangzhou (B)" <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
	"liudongdong (C)" <liudongdong3@huawei.com>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>, qiujiang <qiujiang@huawei.com>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com" <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"tn@semihalf.com" <tn@semihalf.com>,
	zhangjukuo <zhangjukuo@huawei.com>,
	"xuwei (O)" <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>,
	"Liguozhu (Kenneth)" <liguozhu@hisilicon.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jcm@redhat.com" <jcm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCIe Host Controllers
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 17:07:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <76564455.dlc1WHiVY2@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EE11001F9E5DDD47B7634E2F8A612F2E1EC9EC12@lhreml503-mbs>

On Thursday 04 February 2016 15:11:18 Gabriele Paoloni wrote:
> > 
> > ACPI has its own PCI support, and should not need drivers for host
> > bridges. I don't think we can really mix the two things, as ACPI
> > needs to have access to things like PCI config space way before
> > we are probing normal device drivers.
> > 
> > Please put this in drivers/acpi/pci*.c.
> 
> I can put pcie-hisi-acpi.c under drivers/acpi/
> 
> However if you look at the driver it is made up of three parts:
> pcie-hisi.c --> the DT based driver
> pcie-hisi-acpi.c --> the ACPI based hook and ACPI specific init callback
> pcie-hisi-common.c --> common functions shared between DT and ACPI versions 
>                        of the driver
> 
> Now I think that moving pcie-hisi-acpi.c under drivers/acpi/
> would make it hard to read as you need to jump across directories
> and it seems a bit unnatural...
> 
> However it is not a big issue to me...

That's not really what I meant though: the pcie-hisi driver uses the
pcie-designware.c library, most of which makes no sense in an environment
where you have ACPI, e.g. link training, custom MSI support, initial
register setup, platform driver hooks, etc.

You should add a very minimal set of hacks for the parts in this driver
that diverge from a standard SBSA compliant PCIe host that ACPI expects.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-04 16:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-04 11:37 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCIe Host Controllers Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-04 11:37 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] PCI: Designware: Add support for ACPI based controllers Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-04 11:37 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] PCI: hisi: re-architect Hip05/Hip06 controllers driver to preapare for ACPI Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-04 11:37 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] PCI: hisi: Make the HiSilicon PCIe host controller ECAM compliant Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-04 11:37 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] PCI/ACPI: hisi: Add ACPI support for HiSilicon SoCs Host Controllers Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-04 13:11 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Add ACPI support for HiSilicon PCIe " Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-04 15:11   ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-04 16:07     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2016-02-04 16:44       ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-04 17:01         ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-04 17:06           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 13:17           ` Gabriele Paoloni
2016-02-08 13:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-02-08 14:11               ` Sinan Kaya
2016-02-08 16:20                 ` Gabriele Paoloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=76564455.dlc1WHiVY2@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gabriele.paoloni@huawei.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=liguozhu@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=qiujiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=tn@semihalf.com \
    --cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangjukuo@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox