From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lost PCIe PME after a914ff2d78ce ("PCI/ASPM: Don't select CONFIG_PCIEASPM by default")
Date: Sat, 30 May 2020 00:26:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <824d63d8-668c-22c8-a303-b44e30e805e1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529205900.whx3mxuvt6ijlqwg@srcf.ucam.org>
On 29.05.2020 22:59, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:21:35PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
>> Yeah, that makes sense. I can't remember the details, but I'm pretty
>> sure there's a reason why we ask for the whole set of things. Seems
>> like it solved some problem. I think Matthew Garrett might have been
>> involved in that.
>
> This was https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=638912 - some
> firmware misbehaves unless you pass the same set of supported
> functionality as Windows does.
>
Current situation means that PME is unusable on all systems where
pcie_aspm_support_enabled() returns false, what is basically every
system except EXPERT mode is enabled and CONFIG_PCIEASPM is set.
So we definitely need to do something.
One question is whether the system from the 10yr old bug report
actually depends on OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL control, or whether
some other change in recent years fixed the issue.
Not sure whether the system is still available for re-testing.
If worst case we have 10yr old systems breaking with a new kernel
then we still would have the workaround to enable CONFIG_PCIEASPM
on that system.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 22:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200529192143.GA448525@bjorn-Precision-5520>
[not found] ` <2d3944ea-f46c-037b-2395-859c4240f1fb@gmail.com>
2020-05-29 20:09 ` Lost PCIe PME after a914ff2d78ce ("PCI/ASPM: Don't select CONFIG_PCIEASPM by default") Heiner Kallweit
2020-05-29 20:21 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-05-29 20:53 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-05-29 20:59 ` Matthew Garrett
2020-05-29 22:26 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
2020-05-29 22:58 ` Matthew Garrett
2020-05-30 6:33 ` Heiner Kallweit
2020-05-30 7:14 ` Matthew Garrett
2020-05-30 11:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-06-01 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-06-01 15:13 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=824d63d8-668c-22c8-a303-b44e30e805e1@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox