From: "Jean-François Lessard" <jefflessard3@gmail.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2025 14:16:35 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85D46ECF-B4A6-4C78-A4DD-0785FE58B2A3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ed3743b-4f86-42d3-94e0-8a720526dce4@kernel.org>
Le 1 septembre 2025 13 h 48 min 14 s HAE, Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org> a écrit :
>On 9/1/25 6:36 PM, Jean-François Lessard wrote:
>> Add scoped versions of fwnode child node iterators that automatically
>> handle reference counting cleanup using the __free() attribute:
>>
>> - fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped()
>> - fwnode_for_each_named_child_node_scoped()
>> - fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped()
>>
>> These macros follow the same pattern as existing scoped iterators in the
>> kernel, ensuring fwnode references are automatically released when the
>> iterator variable goes out of scope. This prevents resource leaks and
>> eliminates the need for manual cleanup in error paths.
>>
>> The implementation mirrors the non-scoped variants but uses
>> __free(fwnode_handle) for automatic resource management, providing a
>> safer and more convenient interface for drivers iterating over firmware
>> node children.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-François Lessard <jefflessard3@gmail.com>
>
>Thanks for adding a user and splitting it up (Andy was a bit faster than me :).
>
Very welcome! Thanks for reviewing.
>> diff --git a/include/linux/property.h b/include/linux/property.h
>> index 82f0cb3ab..279c244db 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/property.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/property.h
>> @@ -176,6 +176,20 @@ struct fwnode_handle *fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(
>> for (child = fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(fwnode, NULL); child;\
>> child = fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(fwnode, child))
>> +#define fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child) \
>> + for (struct fwnode_handle *child __free(fwnode_handle) = \
>> + fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, NULL); \
>> + child; child = fwnode_get_next_child_node(fwnode, child))
>> +
>> +#define fwnode_for_each_named_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child, name) \
>> + fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped(fwnode, child) \
>> + for_each_if(fwnode_name_eq(child, name))
>
>IIRC, your first patch mentioned that your driver series would only use
>fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped().
You are correct. Next version of TM16XX driver patch series will use
fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped()
>
>And this series adds a user for fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped(); do you also have a user for fwnode_for_each_named_child_node_scoped()?
No, I haven't found an existing user that requires the scoped version. The only
usage I found of the non-scoped fwnode_for_each_named_child_node() is in
drivers/base/property.c in fwnode_get_named_child_node_count(), which doesn't
need to put the fwnode.
I included it for consistency since the header defines all three non-scoped
variants, but I understand the "no dead code" policy concern.
Would you prefer I drop the fwnode_for_each_named_child_node_scoped()
variant and submit a v4 with only the two variants that have real users?
Regards,
Jean-François Lessard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-01 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-01 16:36 [PATCH v3 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-01 16:36 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-01 17:48 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-01 18:16 ` Jean-François Lessard [this message]
2025-09-02 4:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-09-02 16:54 ` Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-01 16:36 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] i2c: core: Use fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-02 9:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-02 16:56 ` Jean-François Lessard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85D46ECF-B4A6-4C78-A4DD-0785FE58B2A3@gmail.com \
--to=jefflessard3@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox