Re: [PATCH] gpiolib: acpi: Add a ignore wakeup quirk for Clevo NH5xAx

[Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>]

On 2/13/23 06:41, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:30:08PM +0100, Werner Sembach wrote:
>> Am 10.02.23 um 18:04 schrieb Andy Shevchenko:
>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 05:46:36PM +0100, Werner Sembach wrote:
>>>> commit 1796f808e4bb ("HID: i2c-hid: acpi: Stop setting wakeup_capable")
>>>> changed the policy such that I2C touchpads may be able to wake up the
>>>> system by default if the system is configured as such.
>>>>
>>>> However on Clevo NH5xAx/TUXEDO XA15 Gen10 there is a mistake in the ACPI
>>>> tables that the TP_ATTN# signal connected to GPIO 10 is configured as
>>>> ActiveLow and level triggered but connected to a pull up.
>>> I'm not sure I understand the issue here. From what you say here it seems
>>> correct ACPI description.
>> TBH I copied the commit description from https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=4cb786180dfb5258ff3111181b5e4ecb1d4a297b
>> which is for a different device having the exact same problem.
> Yeah, and I reviewed that and seems paid no attention to this detail.
>
> So, ActiveLow + PullUp is the _right_ thing to do in ACPI.
> The problem seems somewhere else.
>
> Mario, can we have an access to the schematics of the affected pin to
> understand better what's going on?
>
> Or is that description missing some crucial detail?

The schematics were shared by the reporter for the original issue which 
is how we reached the conclusion there was a mistake.

As they're both Clevo designs it's certainly possible they have the same 
mistake in two systems.

>>>> As soon as the
>>>> system suspends the touchpad loses power and then the system wakes up.
>>>>
>>>> To avoid this problem, introduce a quirk for this model that will prevent
>>>> the wakeup capability for being set for GPIO 10.
>>> I'm not against fixing this, but wouldn't be better to actually target the root
>>> cause and have a different quirk? Or is it me who didn't get what is the root
>>> cause?
>>>
>> I missed to reference the original discussion while copying the description:
>> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1722#note_1720627 (Note that
>> it's a somewhat convoluted issue spanning multiple bugs when you scroll up
>> from that particular linked comment, which are however irrelevant for this
>> patch)
>>
>> I'm not deep into how ACPI defined IRQ work so maybe not a good idea for me
>> summing it up, as I might have misunderstood parts of it ^^
> The GpioIo() and GpioInt() resources have gaps in them, due to this some
> additional information is required or some heuristics is used to deduct
> the settings.
>
> All this is described in
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/firmware-guide/acpi/gpio-properties.html
>
>> I added the other ones from there to the cc.
> Thank you.
>