From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olivier Berger Subject: Re: Incorrect ACPI blacklisting of ASUS P4B266 ? Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 08:11:14 +0200 Message-ID: <8763gepxq5.fsf@olivierberger.com> References: <87k5691x3y.fsf@olivierberger.com> <200904281339.15689.trenn@suse.de> <877i14aed8.fsf@olivierberger.com> <200904281956.50640.trenn@suse.de> <87preupy80.fsf@olivierberger.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.6]:44078 "EHLO smtp6-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751843AbZEFGLY (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2009 02:11:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87preupy80.fsf@olivierberger.com> (Olivier Berger's message of "Thu\, 30 Apr 2009 06\:22\:23 +0200") Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: len.brown@intel.com Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi. Olivier Berger writes: > Thomas Renninger writes: > >> On Tuesday 28 April 2009 19:15:47 Olivier Berger wrote: >>> Thomas Renninger writes: >> >> >>> I'm thinking about some kind of warning message that might be provided >>> by the kernel. >>> >>> Currently, the blacklisting issues something like : >>> xxx detected : force use of acpi=ht >>> >>> Maybe in some greylisted cases (like such ASUS P4B266), an additional >>> message may be issued, something like : >>> xxx detected : may work with acpi=force (test at own risk) >>> or something like that ? >> Sounds like a good idea. >> Something like that (not tested at all). >> I could imagine Len adds this one if you give it a try and see >> the message popping up in dmesg. > > I can confirm this works. > May I ask you to review the patch provided here : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=124094144423277&w=2 ? I'm asking directly as I saw no response on the list. Sorry to bother you. Thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/