Re: Compaq Evo 510SFF and ACPI

[Alexander Hoogerhuis <alexh-rpjHciJLgqZBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>]

Scott Duplichan <sduplichan-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:

> 
> I believe the problem is that 'saved_rsdt' is smaller than the EVO rsdt.
> If I am looking at the correct source code, the maximum number of
> tables supported is ACPI_TABLE_COUNT, which is 17. That number is
> based on the assumption that there is at most one table of each type.
> But that assumption is not valid for the EVO 510, because it has many
> SSDT tables, for a total of 21 tables.
> 

Do basically changing the constant and recompiling might solve things?

> -- 
> Scott

-- 
Alexander Hoogerhuis                               | alexh-rpjHciJLgqZBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
CCNP - CCDP - MCNE - CCSE                          | +47 908 21 485
"You have zero privacy anyway. Get over it."  --Scott McNealy


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01