public inbox for linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Cc: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Refactor GHES to better support non-APEI systems
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 10:24:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d185qejv.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170801133608.21017-1-punit.agrawal@arm.com> (Punit Agrawal's message of "Tue, 1 Aug 2017 14:36:05 +0100")

Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@arm.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> The small series re-factors the GHES driver initialisation to move
> memory allocation and checks from driver init to device probe. The net
> effect is to improve the situation for systems that do not support
> APEI.
>
> The patches are organised as -
>
> * Unify estatus pool creation and expansion into ghes_estatus_pool_init()
> * Move memory initialisation and firmware first support checks from
>   driver init to device probe
> * Do not set hest_disable if HEST not found
>
> The set of patches initially started out as a single patch[0]. The
> current series is the re-worked approach based on ensuing
> discussion. They patches are based on v4.13-rc3 and have been tested
> on a system that does not support APEI. Further testing on systems
> that support APEI to ensure that the changes do not break expected
> behaviour will be greatly appreciated.

Ping!

Boris, have you had a chance to look at the re-factoring of the GHES init?

>
> Thanks,
> Punit
>
> [0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/7/20/430
>
> Punit Agrawal (3):
>   GHES: Expand the estatus pool in ghes_estatus_pool_init()
>   GHES: Move memory initialisation to ghes_probe()
>   ACPI / APEI: HEST: Don't set hest_disable if table not found
>
>  drivers/acpi/apei/ghes.c | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  drivers/acpi/apei/hest.c |   2 +-
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-08-09  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-01 13:36 [PATCH 0/3] Refactor GHES to better support non-APEI systems Punit Agrawal
2017-08-01 13:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] GHES: Expand the estatus pool in ghes_estatus_pool_init() Punit Agrawal
2017-08-01 13:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] GHES: Move memory initialisation to ghes_probe() Punit Agrawal
2017-08-01 14:04   ` Punit Agrawal
2017-08-14 19:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-15 10:10     ` Punit Agrawal
2017-08-15  8:35       ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-15 10:31         ` Punit Agrawal
2017-08-15 10:56           ` Borislav Petkov
2017-08-01 13:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] ACPI / APEI: HEST: Don't set hest_disable if table not found Punit Agrawal
2017-08-09  9:24 ` Punit Agrawal [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d185qejv.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=punit.agrawal@arm.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox