From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Francisco Ayala Le Brun <francisco@videowindow.eu>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug report: probe of AMDI0040:00 failed with error -16
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2024 21:07:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87frwighea.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZ5v0hgWGWneAgqCxZ2L85nrM_7J7H1g042sA5tzz234BNUGw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Mar 22 2024 at 15:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 3:28 PM Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaroorg> wrote:
>> Uhhh I rather not, the other approach will cover the invariably recurring
>> instances of this, it will not be the last time we see something like this.
>
> I'm not actually sure how likely this is.
>
> The ACPI SCI is generally heavy-wieght, so it is not shared very often
> (and I believe that there is a particular reason for sharing it with a
> GPIO chip) and this very well may be an exception.
>
>> We need tglx input on this, I could merge the patch below with some
>> big TODO to fix it properly if the discussion about the proper solution
>> takes too much time.
>>
>> But I rather not hack around with IRQs without tglx (or marcz, but he
>> got overloaded) input.
>
> Fair enough.
>
> I guess I'll post the first patch with a proper changelog next week
> and we'll see.
Yes please. The COND flag makes a lot of sense. Hacking around it in the
driver is just a bandaid.
Thanks,
tglx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-22 20:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAN-StX1HqWqi+YW=t+V52-38Mfp5fAz7YHx4aH-CQjgyNiKx3g@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <36198864-579e-41f0-baf6-917f0a7f4bfa@intel.com>
2024-03-20 19:29 ` Bug report: probe of AMDI0040:00 failed with error -16 Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-21 16:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-22 14:28 ` Linus Walleij
2024-03-22 14:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2024-03-22 20:07 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87frwighea.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=francisco@videowindow.eu \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox