From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Pfaff Subject: Re: [Ubuntu PATCH] acpi: Add IBM R60E laptop to proc-idle blacklist Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 20:51:09 -0700 Message-ID: <87lkrstrgy.fsf@benpfaff.org> References: <4491BC6B.5000704@oracle.com> <20060619203333.5e897ead.akpm@osdl.org> Reply-To: blp@cs.stanford.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:00:43 -0700 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> [UBUNTU:acpi] Add IBM R60E laptop to proc-idle blacklist. >> + { set_max_cstate, "IBM ThinkPad R40e", { >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VENDOR, "IBM"), >> + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BIOS_VERSION, "1SET70WW") }, (void*)1}, > > It seems that every R40e in the world is in that table. The email says R60e. The string says R40e. Which is correct? -- Ben Pfaff email: blp@cs.stanford.edu web: http://benpfaff.org