From: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@niif.hu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
yakui.zhao@intel.com, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] intermittent suspend problem again
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:35:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87my2qwff8.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911111547.21149.rjw@sisk.pl> (Rafael J. Wysocki's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:47:21 +0100")
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> Yes, echo "core" to /sys/power/pm_test before executing s2disk.
It snapshots the system and returns, producing the same console output
as s2ram (is this the expected behaviour?) I ran this several times in
a loop, and experienced no problems at all. Maybe it depends on the
amount of memory used... I saw a freeze saying "99% done" (ie. not
100%), btw. Are other pm_test values meaningful with s2disk? Is this
handled explicitly in s2disk, or does simply the kernel act as if it was
resumed instead of providing the system image after SNAPSHOT_CREATE_IMAGE?
> On Wednesday 11 November 2009, Ferenc Wagner wrote:
>
>> I already did the test for STR (see
>> http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22126#c3), but will redo
>> with the current kernel tonight.
>
> OK, thanks.
No change on this front, FWIW. But rc7 is out now, I'll test again.
--
Thanks,
Feri.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-13 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <87fx93pwv2.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
[not found] ` <200910281956.44791.rjw@sisk.pl>
[not found] ` <87d447m52t.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu>
2009-10-29 18:36 ` [linux-pm] intermittent suspend problem again Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-29 22:31 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-10-30 18:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-30 19:03 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-10-30 20:38 ` [linux-pm] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-10-31 12:02 ` Alan Jenkins
2009-10-31 14:06 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-10-31 19:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-01 21:53 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-03 11:02 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-11 11:29 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-11 11:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-11 13:29 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-11 14:47 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-13 16:35 ` Ferenc Wagner [this message]
2009-11-13 19:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-14 1:50 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-14 18:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-18 1:12 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-18 14:05 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-18 22:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-18 22:54 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-19 12:00 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-19 13:02 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-19 19:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-11-21 23:59 ` [linux-pm] " Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-28 19:01 ` Ferenc Wagner
2009-11-29 0:29 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87my2qwff8.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu \
--to=wferi@niif.hu \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=yakui.zhao@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox