Re: Avoid critical temp shutdowns on specific ThinkPad T4x(p) and R50p

Andi Kleen
2008-08-12T08:00:24Z

Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 04:14:14PM +0200, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
>> So what is the status here, how should we proceed?
>> This isn't applied to any tree yet?
>> IMO you should send those two with below fixed and Andi could queue them on
>> the test branch and keep it a while there.
>
> I posted them, got a small amount of feedback and no further acks. I can
> push them again.

The problem seems to be that some people report this as a regression.
So either:

- It's not actually an regression but has always been this way.
In this case it's fine to delay.

- It's an regression. Then something must have been changed. Do we know what that is?
If it's really an regression then we need a low-risk fix for .27.

-Andi