From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D1F614A0A3; Fri, 24 Jan 2025 08:23:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737707016; cv=none; b=SnP0ajGALuiqO0WT+WG93uQkUQUfnCAvEDRmIJ1Y5VpcgkD1Mf+ys2J/BmcDDRyvoKiXYoTh2Orw9Xigin5K4TsMTSmE9DNGq2OzyIiXkJysnTBMA1O6K42i99pZ1XzyzU4RCgQIFvx3XUlbhUTjo5VBgTbYJItmnTzbMuja6nc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1737707016; c=relaxed/simple; bh=u8jAzB9luBerrGnpeGITarnZaJCCRoOJb/od4Hjllpw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=g+mbdhZMSI9L4I87bhTo2jGv6i0dxIkUYYJYnOU6BbJTms+Bkm0EXf5esf64JGrGdrX/b8kqQu05kfvM18INsR63uhlDFTGeC0AQEVMQ3uzgL9JCUtFUbVnv2iswOglFzjur5g+gAjglE9chNQI60vFVGtSs17ZgOUYK5zfyhWI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=i9jEOpSl; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=pMQDqABw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="i9jEOpSl"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="pMQDqABw" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1737707006; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u8jAzB9luBerrGnpeGITarnZaJCCRoOJb/od4Hjllpw=; b=i9jEOpSlMDa2M2CguNXrvcShhPwQvjlHcNjbhAxszqsE1ZLGPXP266X0JBDQz7pxLV4uAV r1L9+pNn702PPlVAFuS276P7OuxUcXCxqOfBOszvygqCwlU908x7csK9kaSe5/y4vvCMN+ VDnzd02JIiXOcbVoY2VUXlL++RUj52KBwurmUfOZ0PmAwoFUPf+mr4+z6/2asXRV6Mo84F txL+8/bPI4IAYFRb9F5Eyovj394vLtg+ayDFSCURmy1Xd26+Mrw530IQtM1YNjC97PKg7y cTCZAht8wG1tMHbix6+6r/kT2duTdY0P3RYEQNbzCs8ozHcOpO0PS4zEm052BQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1737707006; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=u8jAzB9luBerrGnpeGITarnZaJCCRoOJb/od4Hjllpw=; b=pMQDqABwiuVQ1xLjoOG1BKQr79T6gUJst6Ow1ws4I0tdfzmF4P8vCd9YWK96ANqOf+S8XU 2joppHKcBeE8MhBg== To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Zhang Rui , dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, bp@alien8.de Cc: rafael@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmattson@google.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] x86/acpi: Fix LAPIC/x2APIC parsing order In-Reply-To: References: <20250117081420.4046737-1-rui.zhang@intel.com> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 09:23:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87v7u48vsy.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Thu, Jan 23 2025 at 20:12, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> 1. https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/05_ACPI_Software_Programming_Model.html#madt-processor-local-apic-sapic-structure-entry-order >> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Reported-by: Jim Mattson >> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241010213136.668672-1-jmattson@google.com/ >> Fixes: ec9aedb2aa1a ("x86/acpi: Ignore invalid x2APIC entries") >> Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui >> Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson >> Tested-by: Jim Mattson >> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner > > x86 folks, should I apply this? Sure.