From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arch_timer: acpi: add hisi timer erratum data Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:49:10 +0100 Message-ID: <8cc0c3eb-c279-5cb1-4d6f-1a6419e0874e@linaro.org> References: <1485254391-51551-1-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> <1485254391-51551-3-git-send-email-guohanjun@huawei.com> <20170124105717.GB6277@leverpostej> <589D6776.2010400@huawei.com> <20170216091454.GA2160@mai> <48bb19c9-d1f3-a5c1-ec82-4b19d45f88fd@suse.de> <58A574D9.10300@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f169.google.com ([209.85.128.169]:36472 "EHLO mail-wr0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750982AbdBPJtN (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:49:13 -0500 Received: by mail-wr0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 89so3176275wrr.3 for ; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:49:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <58A574D9.10300@huawei.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Sanil Kumar , Ding Tianhong Cc: Alexander Graf , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Marc Zyngier , Will Deacon , linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, mbrugger@suse.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Hanjun Guo , yousaf.kaukab@suse.com, Fu Wei , Hanjun Guo On 16/02/2017 10:46, Sanil Kumar wrote: > On 2/16/2017 3:11 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> >> On 2017/2/16 17:32, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> >>> On 16/02/2017 10:14, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >>>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>>> >>>> [ ... ] >>>> >>>>>>>> I believe Marc is looking at some rework in this area which may >>>>>>>> enable >>>>>>>> this, so please wait for that to appear. >>>>>>> Yeah, I'm implementing a semi-flexible way to add new quirk >>>>>>> types, and >>>>>>> the last thing I want to see is two (or more) tables describing >>>>>>> the same >>>>>>> thing. >>>>>> Kindly ping, if you have patches in hand, I can test against our >>>>>> platforms, >>>>>> thank you very much. >>>>> Any progress on this? I'm not a big fan of stalling erratum fixes >>>>> upstream >>>>> because of potential future refactoring. >>>> The fix is in the tip tree, soon in v4.11-rc1 when the merge will be >>>> finished. >>>> >>>> http://goo.gl/x90qwE >>>> http://goo.gl/asCBBD >>> Oh, I missed that. Sorry for the fuss :). >>> >>> >>> Alex >>> >> Hi, I thinks the tip tree is only applied the erratum for DT, not for >> ACPI, the patch >> for ACPI is not applied yet, so the work isn't finished. ：） > Yes, initial thread was about ACPI part. I think Alex was asking about > that. Ah yes. Indeed. Thanks. -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog