From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI/PPTT: Trivial, Modify the case of CPU Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 14:07:52 +0200 Message-ID: <9111298.efd3gzfPJI@kreacher> References: <20190426220309.55654-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <51abea94-15d6-e712-411e-bf7fcf2902b6@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51abea94-15d6-e712-411e-bf7fcf2902b6@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Jeremy Linton Cc: Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Catalin Marinas , John Garry , Will Deacon , Linuxarm , ACPI Devel Maling List , Sudeep Holla , Linux ARM , Len Brown List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 5:46:49 PM CEST Jeremy Linton wrote: > Hi, > > And sorry about the delay... > > On 4/29/19 3:50 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:03 AM Jeremy Linton wrote: > >> > >> CPU is an acronym and customarily capitalized. Much of the > >> commenting in the PPTT code has been using "cpu" rather > >> than "CPU". Correct that, and other human readable strings. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton > > > > It would be better to say "Modify the spelling of CPU" in the subject > > IMO, but apart from that > > Hmmm, spelling doesn't seem quite right either, how about "capitalization"? That would work for me too. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE7AC04A6B for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 12:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFCC20830 for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 12:07:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725883AbfEFMHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 08:07:55 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:43417 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725827AbfEFMHz (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 May 2019 08:07:55 -0400 Received: from 79.184.253.223.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.253.223) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.213) id 8f8b8ef4e30ad709; Mon, 6 May 2019 14:07:53 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Jeremy Linton Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux ARM , ACPI Devel Maling List , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Len Brown , Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Sudeep Holla , Linuxarm , John Garry Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI/PPTT: Trivial, Modify the case of CPU Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 14:07:52 +0200 Message-ID: <9111298.efd3gzfPJI@kreacher> In-Reply-To: <51abea94-15d6-e712-411e-bf7fcf2902b6@arm.com> References: <20190426220309.55654-1-jeremy.linton@arm.com> <51abea94-15d6-e712-411e-bf7fcf2902b6@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20190506120752.8K3cHvKN2MTs5U_Px2rAzll9LNscSObQEHQzQ9rkETI@z> On Wednesday, May 1, 2019 5:46:49 PM CEST Jeremy Linton wrote: > Hi, > > And sorry about the delay... > > On 4/29/19 3:50 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 12:03 AM Jeremy Linton wrote: > >> > >> CPU is an acronym and customarily capitalized. Much of the > >> commenting in the PPTT code has been using "cpu" rather > >> than "CPU". Correct that, and other human readable strings. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Linton > > > > It would be better to say "Modify the spelling of CPU" in the subject > > IMO, but apart from that > > Hmmm, spelling doesn't seem quite right either, how about "capitalization"? That would work for me too.