From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
jgross@suse.com, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] acpi/processor: fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2022 08:17:56 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93fd7ed0-5311-d6db-4d8b-b992a8f78ada@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y4nugxKV1J/BqhBt@Air-de-Roger>
On 12/2/22 04:24, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On the implementation side, is the proposed approach acceptable?
> Mostly asking because it adds Xen conditionals to otherwise generic
> ACPI code.
That's a good Rafael question.
But, how do other places in the ACPI code handle things like this?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-02 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221121102113.41893-1-roger.pau@citrix.com>
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] acpi/processor: fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0 Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 14:02 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 14:29 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-21 14:51 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 15:09 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-29 16:01 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-29 17:43 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-30 15:53 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-11-30 16:48 ` Dave Hansen
2022-12-02 12:24 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-12-02 16:17 ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-12-02 16:37 ` Roger Pau Monné
2022-12-02 17:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-12-09 10:12 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-01-30 9:21 ` Josef Johansson
2023-02-03 7:05 ` Jan Beulich
2023-02-03 13:58 ` Josef Johansson
2022-11-21 10:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] acpi/processor: sanitize _PDC buffer bits " Roger Pau Monne
2022-11-21 14:10 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 14:13 ` Jan Beulich
2022-11-21 15:03 ` Roger Pau Monné
2023-06-14 19:57 ` Jason Andryuk
2023-06-16 14:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93fd7ed0-5311-d6db-4d8b-b992a8f78ada@intel.com \
--to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox