From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] acpi: fix trivial warning Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 02:23:35 +0200 Message-ID: <94a0d4530911111623h1ae3463dte8a3f83ec0ad1f75@mail.gmail.com> References: <1252870707-4824-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-2-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-3-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-4-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252870707-4824-5-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <1252936556.28368.215.camel@desktop> <94a0d4530909140734q51779b76g2ddc7211ece87171@mail.gmail.com> <1252940549.28368.255.camel@desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1252940549.28368.255.camel@desktop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Walker Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , Len Brown , Lin Ming , Bob Moore , Andi Kleen , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Daniel Walker wrote: > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 17:34 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> I did... the style issues are already there, my patch is not >> introducing them. Do you want me to send a separate patch to fix the >> existing style issues? > > Yes, If your inclined to clean up the whole file, or just the > surrounding code that would be helpful .. Nobody seems to like the patch you suggested me to do... did I wasted my time doing it? http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.acpi.devel/42383 -- Felipe Contreras