From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jon Smirl Subject: Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC] Reliable video POSTing on resume Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:38:07 -0500 Message-ID: <9e47339105020509382adbbf39@mail.gmail.com> References: <20050122134205.GA9354@wsc-gmbh.de> <4204B3C1.80706@rainbow-software.org> <9e473391050205074769e4f10@mail.gmail.com> <200502051748.43547.stefandoesinger@gmx.at> Reply-To: Jon Smirl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE In-Reply-To: <200502051748.43547.stefandoesinger@gmx.at> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_D=F6singer?= Cc: acpi-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ondrej Zary , Matthew Garrett , Pavel Machek , Carl-Daniel Hailfinger , ncunningham@linuxmail.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:48:43 +0100, Stefan D=F6singer wrote: > The reset code of radeon card seems to be easy to reverse engineer. I= have > started an attempt and I have 50-60% of my radeon M9 reset code imple= mented > in a 32 bit C program. I had to stop due to school reasons. The problem with the radeon reset code is that there are many, many variations of the radeon chips, including different steppings of the same part. The ROM is matched to the paticular bugs of the chip. From what I know ATI doesn't even have a universal radeon reset program. --=20 Jon Smirl jonsmirl@gmail.com