From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Courbot Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] gpiolib / ACPI: move acpi_gpiochip_free_interrupts next to the request function Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 09:55:26 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1381392071-21407-1-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <1381392071-21407-2-git-send-email-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f181.google.com ([209.85.223.181]:49155 "EHLO mail-ie0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756161Ab3JNQzr (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:55:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Mika Westerberg , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Grant Likely , Mathias Nyman , Alexandre Courbot , Rob Landley , ACPI Devel Maling List , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" On Sun, Oct 13, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 10:01 AM, Mika Westerberg >>> wrote: >>> >>>> It makes more sense to have these functions close to each other. No >>>> functional changes. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg >>>> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >>> >>> So I've applied this first patch, and I'm just waiting for Alexandre's >>> ACK on the remaining patches concerning gpiod so we get this >>> 100% right. >> >> I think I'm ok with Mika's patches, however I need to send you a new >> version of gpiod. I wanted to finish documentation first, but maybe >> that can come slightly after so you can at least go ahead with both >> series? > > The important thing right now is to get it in a testable form I think? > So that I can throw it at the autobuilder and it gets included into > linux-next as that comes back online. > > So give me whatever you have ... BTW is this series dependent on > yours to go in first? Sorry for not seeing the details here... Yes it is. I have sent you the v2 of my series last Friday (+ one fix to squash into 3/3).