From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Fu Wei Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 5/9] clocksource/drivers/arm_arch_timer: Simplify ACPI support code. Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:54:48 +0800 Message-ID: References: <1475086637-1914-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <1475086637-1914-6-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org> <20161020165747.GD27598@leverpostej> <20161021111352.GA16630@leverpostej> <20161021112120.GC16630@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20161021112120.GC16630@leverpostej> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Linaro ACPI Mailman List , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , rruigrok@codeaurora.org, Julien Grall , Wim Van Sebroeck , Wei Huang , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Al Stone , Tomasz Nowicki , Timur Tabi , Daniel Lezcano , ACPI Devel Maling List , Guenter Roeck , Len Brown , "Abdulhamid, Harb" , linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Jon Masters , Christopher Covington , Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, G Gregory List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On 21 October 2016 at 19:21, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 12:14:01PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 05:58:17PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:17:13AM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote: >> > > + arch_timer_ppi[PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI] = acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(PHYS_NONSECURE_PPI); >> > > + arch_timer_ppi[VIRT_PPI] = acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(VIRT_PPI); >> > > + arch_timer_ppi[HYP_PPI] = acpi_gtdt_map_ppi(HYP_PPI); >> > > + /* Always-on capability */ >> > > + arch_timer_c3stop = acpi_gtdt_c3stop(); >> > >> > ... I think we should check the flag on the relevant interrupt, though >> > that's worth clarifying. >> >> I see I misread the spec; this is part of the common flags. >> >> Please ignore this point; sorry for the noise. > > Actually, I misread the spec this time around; the flag *can* differ per > interrupt for the sysreg/cp15 timer, but not for the MMIO timers where > the flag is in a common field. > > So please *do* consider the above. yes , you are right , will do Thanks :-) > > Thanks, > Mark. -- Best regards, Fu Wei Software Engineer Red Hat