From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [ACPI/PCI] possible recursive locking detected
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 16:38:53 -0600
Message-ID: <CAErSpo6cwcYbi_pFrGrWgMLXH9dx4Po1s5KLDWtc596s+Kv2hQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20120922003557.GF5959@localhost> <CAE9FiQVQJQfBZn7AH4M5hibx=iNa9RbfSaBdb35FWxDiRXHvrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAE9FiQVQMVsqG2vHhyktTtUSJ_dDRpTpwB_x--agMWbm6PHsEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120922081009.GA5677@localhost> <CAE9FiQWi46m4rP9chVK0W5ahtgk7cuCO60dTYzP6JVM=x=5abA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAE9FiQWi46m4rP9chVK0W5ahtgk7cuCO60dTYzP6JVM=x=5abA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 8:11 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Please check attached patch that should fix the problem.
>>>
>>> updated more aggressive version. two patches.
>>
>> Yes they work nicely. Thank you very much!
>
> Thanks.
>
> v2 breaks acpi_bind_one.
>
> So we should use attached -v3.
>
> Bjorn, please apply -v3 before Taku's patchset.

I  applied this as the first patch in
pci/taku-acpi-pci-host-bridge-v3.  I also merged that branch to
pci/next.