linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Robert Richter <rric@kernel.org>,
	Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>,
	Aravind Gopalakrishnan <aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com>,
	linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	kim.naru@amd.com, Daniel J Blueman <daniel@numascale.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	x86 <x86@kernel.org>, Steffen Persvold <sp@numascale.com>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/PCI: Support additional MMIO range capabilities
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:40:28 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL-B5D2Z7AvJZ3G2JLY6ZOZBRe4DGgO27RVJ_HHotGrnKL7Y1A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140429191454.GB4726@pd.tnic>

On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 10:16:57AM -0500, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
>> In the new code, the IO ECS was needed to retrieve the
>> AMD_NB_F1_MMIO_BASE_LIMIT_HI_REG (offset 0x180) during the early
>> initialization as part of (2) logic. However, this register exists only on
>> the newer systems.  However, as you mentioned, for (2) we can assume that
>> the MCFG exists for most of the systems (family10h and later), and should be
>> used instead.
>>
>> The main purpose of this patch set is mainly to deal with the the node
>> information (1).  So, we might need to split these all up and handle them
>> separately as needed where (2) and (3) will be used as fallback for older
>> systems where MCFG does not exist.
>
> So sounds to me like we want to get rid of the whole IO ECS deal
> altogether then.
>
> Now, I'm wondering whether we should kill it completely since I don't
> think anyone cares about numa node info being correct on K8, or? I'm
> specifically turning to our numascale friends who love to have a lot of
> nodes. :-)

I think we need to be careful here as there are two unrelated topics
being discussed together.  What started this whole thread was the need
for sysfs related numa_node information with respect to PCI devices
(1).  Without patch 1, platforms with newer AMD CPUs end up having
'-1' numa_node values for all PCI devices.

IO ECS has no bearing on patch 1, it only comes into play with patch 2
which is concerned with MMIO resource information when MCFG doesn't
exist.  For the particular issue I'm trying to get resolved, patch 2
is not needed.  However, since we have expended time and effort on
this subject, perhaps we should get this cleaned up while it has our
attention.

I'm all for deleting as much of amd_bus.c as possible due to its
"perennial maintenance headache".  The obvious choices seem to be all,
or some combination, of:
  o removing IO ECS logic,
  o removing IO/MMIO logic (assuming MCFG issues were long enough ago
to no longer be a concern),
  o start deprecating amd_bus.c by adding logic to skip if BIOS >= 2015

Myron

>
> Daniel, Steffen?
>
> --
> Regards/Gruss,
>     Boris.
>
> Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
> --

  reply	other threads:[~2014-04-29 21:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1394053603-3724-1-git-send-email-suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>
2014-03-05 21:24 ` [PATCH 0/3] amd/pci: Add AMD hostbridge supports for newer AMD systems Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-06  2:13   ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-03-06  6:30     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-03-06 17:40       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-06 20:03         ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-03-11 18:12           ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-12 21:13             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-13  1:30               ` Myron Stowe
2014-03-14  2:06               ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-03-17 17:18                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-03-20 17:42                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-04-19  2:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] x86/PCI: Add AMD hostbridge support " Myron Stowe
2014-04-19  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] x86/PCI: Add support for generic AMD hostbridges Myron Stowe
2014-04-19 11:31     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-28 21:10       ` Myron Stowe
2014-04-19  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] x86/PCI: Support additional MMIO range capabilities Myron Stowe
2014-04-19 13:52     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-20  7:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-25 22:24         ` Myron Stowe
2014-04-26  9:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-28 20:50             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-04-28 21:40               ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-29  7:33                 ` Andreas Herrmann
2014-04-29 10:20                   ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-29 13:07                     ` Steffen Persvold
2014-04-29 15:16                     ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-04-29 19:14                       ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-29 21:40                         ` Myron Stowe [this message]
2014-04-30  7:00                           ` Robert Richter
2014-04-30  7:50                             ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2014-04-30  9:51                               ` Robert Richter
2014-04-30 23:03                             ` Myron Stowe
2014-04-29 11:19                   ` Robert Richter
2014-04-29  7:06               ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-29  3:04           ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-04-28 21:19       ` Myron Stowe
2014-04-29  2:47         ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-04-29 17:17     ` Robert Richter
2014-04-30  6:41     ` Robert Richter
2014-04-19  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] x86/PCI: Miscellaneous code clean up for early_fillup_mp_bus_info Myron Stowe
2014-04-20  8:02     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-28 21:21       ` Myron Stowe
2014-04-19  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI/PCI: Warn if we have to "guess" host bridge node information Myron Stowe
2014-04-20 10:21     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-28 21:24       ` Myron Stowe
2014-04-29 19:16         ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-19  2:53   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] PCI: Remove redundant 'quirk_amd_nb_node' Myron Stowe
2014-04-20 10:54     ` Borislav Petkov
2014-04-20 13:44       ` Myron Stowe
2014-04-21 16:53         ` Daniel J Blueman
2014-04-29  2:02           ` Suravee Suthikulanit
2014-04-29 19:29             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2014-04-28 21:28       ` Myron Stowe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAL-B5D2Z7AvJZ3G2JLY6ZOZBRe4DGgO27RVJ_HHotGrnKL7Y1A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=myron.stowe@gmail.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=aravind.gopalakrishnan@amd.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=daniel@numascale.com \
    --cc=herrmann.der.user@googlemail.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kim.naru@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=myron.stowe@redhat.com \
    --cc=rric@kernel.org \
    --cc=sp@numascale.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).