From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felipe Contreras Subject: Re: [PATCH] acpi: update win8 OSI blacklist Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2013 18:36:57 -0500 Message-ID: References: <1380820383-23336-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <20131004161226.GA22784@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006203353.GA19795@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006204518.GA20077@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006205928.GA20296@srcf.ucam.org> <20131006233106.GA21562@srcf.ucam.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:56029 "EHLO mail-la0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754775Ab3JFXg6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 6 Oct 2013 19:36:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131006233106.GA21562@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , ACPI Devel Maling List , "Rafael J. Wysocki" On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 06:27:28PM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: >> From acpi_osi_dmi_table: >> >> /* >> * BIOS invocation of _OSI(Linux) is almost always a BIOS bug. >> * Linux ignores it, except for the machines enumerated below. >> */ > > Which was a mistake. We learn from mistakes rather than repeating them. According to you. Sane human beings have no problem with divisions. /* section 1 */ a(); b(); c(); /* section 2 */ d(); e(); /* section 3 */ f(); -- Felipe Contreras