From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>,
Nipun Gupta <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
Nikhil Agarwal <nikhil.agarwal@amd.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Charan Teja Kalla <quic_charante@quicinc.com>,
Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing into the proper probe path
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:37:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWPFnHTFeeWL2-BU8tKOL-E5K2ROOz=LLBLTJJLCK9NgA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3b191e6fd6ca9a1e84c5e5e40044faf97abb874.1740753261.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
Hi Robin,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 at 16:51, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> wrote:
> In hindsight, there were some crucial subtleties overlooked when moving
> {of,acpi}_dma_configure() to driver probe time to allow waiting for
> IOMMU drivers with -EPROBE_DEFER, and these have become an
> ever-increasing source of problems. The IOMMU API has some fundamental
> assumptions that iommu_probe_device() is called for every device added
> to the system, in the order in which they are added. Calling it in a
> random order or not at all dependent on driver binding leads to
> malformed groups, a potential lack of isolation for devices with no
> driver, and all manner of unexpected concurrency and race conditions.
> We've attempted to mitigate the latter with point-fix bodges like
> iommu_probe_device_lock, but it's a losing battle and the time has come
> to bite the bullet and address the true source of the problem instead.
>
> The crux of the matter is that the firmware parsing actually serves two
> distinct purposes; one is identifying the IOMMU instance associated with
> a device so we can check its availability, the second is actually
> telling that instance about the relevant firmware-provided data for the
> device. However the latter also depends on the former, and at the time
> there was no good place to defer and retry that separately from the
> availability check we also wanted for client driver probe.
>
> Nowadays, though, we have a proper notion of multiple IOMMU instances in
> the core API itself, and each one gets a chance to probe its own devices
> upon registration, so we can finally make that work as intended for
> DT/IORT/VIOT platforms too. All we need is for iommu_probe_device() to
> be able to run the iommu_fwspec machinery currently buried deep in the
> wrong end of {of,acpi}_dma_configure(). Luckily it turns out to be
> surprisingly straightforward to bootstrap this transformation by pretty
> much just calling the same path twice. At client driver probe time,
> dev->driver is obviously set; conversely at device_add(), or a
> subsequent bus_iommu_probe(), any device waiting for an IOMMU really
> should *not* have a driver already, so we can use that as a condition to
> disambiguate the two cases, and avoid recursing back into the IOMMU core
> at the wrong times.
>
> Obviously this isn't the nicest thing, but for now it gives us a
> functional baseline to then unpick the layers in between without many
> more awkward cross-subsystem patches. There are some minor side-effects
> like dma_range_map potentially being created earlier, and some debug
> prints being repeated, but these aren't significantly detrimental. Let's
> make things work first, then deal with making them nice.
>
> With the basic flow finally in the right order again, the next step is
> probably turning the bus->dma_configure paths inside-out, since all we
> really need from bus code is its notion of which device and input ID(s)
> to parse the common firmware properties with...
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> # pci-driver.c
> Acked-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org> # of/device.c
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Thanks for your patch, which is now commit bcb81ac6ae3c2ef9 ("iommu:
Get DT/ACPI parsing into the proper probe path") in iommu/next.
This patch triggers two issues on R-Car Gen3 platforms:
1. I am seeing a warning on Renesas Salvator-XS with R-Car M3N
(but not on the similar board with R-Car H3), and only for SATA[1].
Unfortunately commit 73d2f10957f517e5 ("iommu: Don't warn prematurely
about dodgy probes") does not help:
------------[ cut here ]------------
sata_rcar ee300000.sata: late IOMMU probe at driver bind,
something fishy here!
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13 at drivers/iommu/iommu.c:571
__iommu_probe_device+0x208/0x38c
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 13 Comm: kworker/u8:1 Not tainted
6.14.0-rc3-rcar3-00020-g73d2f10957f5-dirty #315
Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT)
Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
pc : __iommu_probe_device+0x208/0x38c
lr : __iommu_probe_device+0x208/0x38c
sp : ffffffc086da39a0
x29: ffffffc086da39b0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 0000000000000000
x26: 0000000000000001 x25: ffffffc080e0e0ae x24: ffffffc080e0e0bb
x23: 0000000000000000 x22: ffffff800bd3d090 x21: ffffffc080acf680
x20: ffffff8008e8f780 x19: ffffff800aca8810 x18: 00000000e9f55e4c
x17: 6874656d6f73202c x16: 646e696220726576 x15: 0720072007200720
x14: 0720072007200720 x13: 0720072007200720 x12: 0720072007200720
x11: 00000000000001ac x10: ffffffc086da3700 x9 : ffffffc083edb140
x8 : ffffffc086da3698 x7 : ffffffc086da36a0 x6 : 00000000fff7ffff
x5 : c0000000fff7ffff x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000001
x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffffff80083d5380
Call trace:
__iommu_probe_device+0x208/0x38c (P)
iommu_probe_device+0x34/0x74
of_iommu_configure+0x128/0x200
of_dma_configure_id+0xdc/0x1d4
platform_dma_configure+0x48/0x6c
really_probe+0xf0/0x260
__driver_probe_device+0xec/0x104
driver_probe_device+0x3c/0xc0
__device_attach_driver+0x58/0xcc
bus_for_each_drv+0xb8/0xe0
__device_attach+0xdc/0x138
device_initial_probe+0x10/0x18
bus_probe_device+0x38/0xa0
deferred_probe_work_func+0xb4/0xcc
process_scheduled_works+0x2e4/0x4a8
worker_thread+0x144/0x1cc
kthread+0x188/0x198
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
irq event stamp: 49052
hardirqs last enabled at (49051): [<ffffffc0800fb6a8>]
__up_console_sem+0x50/0x74
hardirqs last disabled at (49052): [<ffffffc0809eb65c>] el1_dbg+0x20/0x6c
softirqs last enabled at (49046): [<ffffffc080096c50>]
handle_softirqs+0x1b0/0x3b4
softirqs last disabled at (48839): [<ffffffc080010168>]
__do_softirq+0x10/0x18
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
I added debug prints to sata_rcar_probe(), and verified SATA is
probed at about the same time on R-Car H3 and M3N, and the probe is
never deferred.
Do you have a clue?
2. The IOMMU driver's iommu_ops.of_xlate() callback is called about
three times as much as before:
+platform ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform fea27000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform fea2f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform fe950000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform fe96f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform fea27000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform fea2f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform fe9af000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-fcp fe950000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-fcp fe96f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-fcp fea27000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-fcp fea2f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-fcp fe9af000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-dmac ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-dmac ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e6700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e6800000.ethernet: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e6700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e7300000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e7310000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e6800000.ethernet: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ee100000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ee140000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ee160000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e6700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e7300000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e7310000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform e6800000.ethernet: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ee100000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ee140000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ee160000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
+platform ee300000.sata: ipmmu_of_xlate
sata_rcar ee300000.sata: ipmmu_of_xlate
ravb e6800000.ethernet: ipmmu_of_xlate
-renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee100000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
-renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee140000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
-renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee160000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-dmac e6700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-dmac e7300000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
rcar-dmac e7310000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
For some devices, it can be called up to 6 times. All of the duplicates
happen before the device is bound (cfr. "platform" instead of the
actual driver name):
6 platform ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
6 platform ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
3 platform e6800000.ethernet: ipmmu_of_xlate
3 platform e6700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
2 platform fea2f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
2 platform fea27000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
2 platform ee160000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
2 platform ee140000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
2 platform ee100000.mmc: ipmmu_of_xlate
2 platform e7310000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
2 platform e7300000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 platform fe9af000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 platform fe96f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 platform fe950000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 platform ee300000.sata: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 sata_rcar ee300000.sata: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-fcp fea2f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-fcp fea27000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-fcp fe9af000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-fcp fe96f000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-fcp fe950000.fcp: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-dmac ec720000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-dmac ec700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-dmac e7310000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-dmac e7300000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 rcar-dmac e6700000.dma-controller: ipmmu_of_xlate
1 ravb e6800000.ethernet: ipmmu_of_xlate
Before, the callback was called just once for each DMA slave device.
Is this intentional?
Thanks!
[1] SATA IOMMU on R-Car Gen3 needs an out-of-tree patch to add it to
drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c:devices_allowlist[].
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-18 16:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 15:46 [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu: Fix the longstanding probe issues Robin Murphy
2025-02-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] iommu: Handle race with default domain setup Robin Murphy
2025-02-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] iommu: Resolve ops in iommu_init_device() Robin Murphy
2025-03-05 17:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] iommu: Keep dev->iommu state consistent Robin Murphy
2025-03-05 18:14 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-02-28 15:46 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu: Get DT/ACPI parsing into the proper probe path Robin Murphy
2025-03-05 18:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-03-07 14:24 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2025-03-07 20:20 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-11 18:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2025-03-12 7:07 ` Baolu Lu
2025-03-12 10:10 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-12 14:34 ` Baolu Lu
2025-03-12 15:21 ` Joerg Roedel
[not found] ` <CGME20250313095633eucas1p29cb55f2504b4bcf67c16b3bd3fa9b8cd@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2025-03-13 9:56 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-13 11:01 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-13 12:23 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-13 13:06 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-13 14:12 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-17 7:37 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-17 18:22 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-21 12:15 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-21 16:48 ` Robin Murphy
2025-04-01 20:34 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-03-13 16:30 ` Anders Roxell
2025-03-18 16:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2025-03-18 17:24 ` Robin Murphy
2025-03-25 15:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2025-03-27 9:47 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2025-03-27 11:00 ` Louis-Alexis Eyraud
2025-04-11 8:02 ` Johan Hovold
2025-04-14 15:37 ` Robin Murphy
2025-04-15 15:08 ` Johan Hovold
2025-04-24 13:58 ` Robin Murphy
2025-04-21 21:19 ` William McVicker
2025-04-22 19:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-22 21:55 ` William McVicker
2025-04-22 23:41 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-04-23 17:31 ` William McVicker
2025-04-23 18:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-08-11 16:44 ` Eric Auger
2025-08-11 17:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-03-10 8:29 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu: Fix the longstanding probe issues Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMuHMdWPFnHTFeeWL2-BU8tKOL-E5K2ROOz=LLBLTJJLCK9NgA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=nikhil.agarwal@amd.com \
--cc=nipun.gupta@amd.com \
--cc=quic_charante@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=stuyoder@gmail.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).