linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: "Zheng, Lv" <lv.zheng@intel.com>,
	"mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com"
	<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
	"hanjun.guo@linaro.org" <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
	"lenb@kernel.org" <lenb@kernel.org>,
	"hdegoede@redhat.com" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
	"mjg59@srcf.ucam.org" <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
	"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"al.stone@linaro.org" <al.stone@linaro.org>,
	"graeme.gregory@linaro.org" <graeme.gregory@linaro.org>,
	"Duran, Leo" <leo.duran@amd.com>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 22:45:29 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D162D21D.19BCD%suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1960107.SMA7G3OmSP@vostro.rjw.lan>

On 4/24/15, 21:28, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:

>On Friday, April 24, 2015 04:08:31 PM Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> On 4/16/15 20:45, Zheng, Lv wrote:
>> > Before back porting this to ACPICA, let me ask one simple question.
>> > According to the spec, the _CLS is optional and PCI specific.
>> > So why should we implement it in ACPICA core not OSPM specific
>>modules?
>> > If this need to be implemented in ACPICA, then what about the
>>following device identification objects?
>> > _DDN, _HRV, _MLS, _PLD, _STR, _SUN
>> >
>> > Thanks and best regards
>> > -Lv
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Sorry for late reply. As for the justification for introducing the _CLS
>> support in the ACPICA, this is mainly because ACPI does not currently
>> define _CID for certain device classes, which used to mostly be PCI
>> devices. Instead, ACPI spec mentioned that _CLS can be used for loading
>> generic drivers on hardware that is compatible with PCI-defined device
>> classes, but that is not implemented on the PCI bus (and is therefore
>> enumerated by ACPI.)
>
>I think it would be good to point to the particular part of the spec
>making that provision.  In what section is that mentioned, exactly?

Here is the copied from section 6.1.3 _CLS (Class Code) from ACPI 5.1 spec:
"This object is used to supply OSPM with the PCI-defined class, subclass
and programming interface for a device. This object is optional but may be
useful for generic drivers written for PCI devices that move off of PCI
and are enumerated by ACPI.²

Otherwise, if the community think it¹s better to not putting the _CLS the
_CLS parsing code in ACPICA since, I can try looking into pulling the code
out of ACPICA. I also noticed a little issue in the patch series where the
ACPI_VALID_CLS is used in the patch 1 but defined in patch 2. I can send
out v9 with the fix once we agree on the _CLS parsing.

Thanks,

Suravee

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2015-04-26 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-30 21:56 [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-30 21:56 ` [V8 PATCH 1/3] ACPICA: Add ACPI _CLS processing Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-13 13:54   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-17  1:45   ` Zheng, Lv
2015-04-17  3:48     ` Moore, Robert
2015-04-24 21:08     ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-25  2:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-26 22:45         ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee [this message]
2015-04-27 20:38           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-27 22:18             ` Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-30 21:56 ` [V8 PATCH 2/3] ACPI / scan: Add support for ACPI _CLS device matching Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-03-30 21:56 ` [V8 PATCH 3/3] ata: ahci_platform: Add ACPI _CLS matching Suravee Suthikulpanit
2015-04-06 15:45 ` [V8 PATCH 0/3] Introduce ACPI support for ahci_platform driver Suravee Suthikulanit
2015-04-23 16:32   ` Suthikulpanit, Suravee
2015-04-23 17:02     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-04-24 20:46       ` Suravee Suthikulpanit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D162D21D.19BCD%suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --to=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
    --cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.duran@amd.com \
    --cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).