From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sanjoy Mahajan Subject: Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [TP 600X S3, vanilla DSDT] Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:19:59 -0500 Message-ID: References: <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F840B4692FA@pdsmsx403> Return-path: Received: from smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68]:27581 "EHLO smtpauth08.mail.atl.earthlink.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751446AbWCWTU3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:20:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:10:00 +0800." <3ACA40606221794F80A5670F0AF15F840B4692FA@pdsmsx403> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: "Yu, Luming" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Tom Seeley , Dave Jones , Jiri Slaby , michael@mihu.de, mchehab@infradead.org, Brian Marete , Ryan Phillips , gregkh@suse.de, "Brown, Len" , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Mark Lord , Randy Dunlap , jgarzik@pobox.com, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>, Pavlik Vojtech , Meelis Roos > Does it mean we need to slow down acpi_ec_intr_read/write ? > Could you try to insert acpi_os_stall (100) after ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT > statement both in acpi_ec_intr_read/write. I added that line in those two places. The result refused to hang with acpi_debug_layer=0x00100010, but it did hang (on the usual second sleep) with it set to 0x10. > Hmmm, then I cannot get the ec access log for hang case?! It seems difficult, but let's keep trying if you have other ideas for how to get it. -Sanjoy `A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves.' - Bertrand de Jouvenal