From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4079BC47089 for ; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 09:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229628AbiLGJxX (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 04:53:23 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:58376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229489AbiLGJxW (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Dec 2022 04:53:22 -0500 Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47DA8165B6; Wed, 7 Dec 2022 01:53:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1670406801; x=1701942801; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ckCdaqkC+O54IBwNTLI3L1oxHJmIGNMoNna/nA9awds=; b=Rnsll2bmac+/Ow+L4CL7HNTHxHwc6oc6n4vlB4Tsj8kzXs0pkA54RHO4 PJv10vz2hKNrw3/AgrorU+qoqM9I7DPZZoLOVFGtMisD44jBUSDgK+Fc/ YyJSR4QxC/xYzvAoHAUJ5ZpYg6fmRfr69Qu26t0UpG0SXsCZ+pMkZyTC1 nesB9bO1kTelwNQsvpBS5DZCtZbvs8pJj0auIJxRa2SAlZADhwWaL2QMd 0wxYcaSVuQWEzRvXFbzgI3F4zEZxGdnXng9UKMwQHrhTr53lt9p206il0 Dxg079UWYAw9GabbyHrJYFkNqJeGXC26jZhNmGLoVtUVW0o2uPlB+qYpj g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10553"; a="314498611" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,225,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="314498611" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Dec 2022 01:53:20 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10553"; a="624242066" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,225,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="624242066" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2022 01:53:15 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1p2r73-005hNA-0o; Wed, 07 Dec 2022 11:53:13 +0200 Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2022 11:53:12 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Sakari Ailus Cc: Heikki Krogerus , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cl=E9ment_L=E9ger?= , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Daniel Scally , Hans de Goede , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Yong Zhi , Bingbu Cao , Tianshu Qiu , Daniel Scally , Petr Mladek , Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] media: ipu3-cio2: Don't dereference fwnode handle Message-ID: References: <20221121152704.30180-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:02:49AM +0000, Sakari Ailus wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 09:10:58PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > Dunno what happened to my previous reply to this. Okay, trying again... > > > > + Cc: Petr, Sergey > > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2022 at 05:27:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > Use acpi_fwnode_handle() instead of dereferencing an fwnode handle directly, > > > which is a better coding practice. > > > > It appears that this series depends on fd070e8ceb90 ("test_printf: Refactor > > fwnode_pointer() to make it more readable") which is in PRINTK tree. > > > > Sakari, Mauro, if you are okay to route this via that tree, can we get your > > tags for that? Otherwise we need to postpone this till v6.2-rc1 (but I would > > like to decrease the chances to appear a new user of the to be removed API). > > > > Note, that Greg Acked v1 of the swnode patches (which are the same in v2). > > Sorry for the late reply. Feel free to do that if it's not too late, with: > > Acked-by: Sakari Ailus Thank you! I think it's a bit late for printk tree to consume this. If it's the case (Petr?) then I will submit a new version after v6.2-rc1 is out. > I don't think the linkelihood for having a new user for this API is high. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko