Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] ACPI: property: Parse _CRS CSI-2 descriptor

[Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Parse newly added ACPI _CRS CSI-2 descriptor for CSI-2 and camera
> configuration. For now, only figure out where the descriptor is present in
> order to allow adding information from it to related devices.

...

> +	memcpy(inst->remote_name, csi2->resource_source.string_ptr,
> +	       csi2->resource_source.string_length);

Why don't we use strscpy()? Is it really strings? Or is it some abuse of
the ACPI object type?

...

> +static acpi_status scan_check_crs_csi2(acpi_handle handle, u32 nesting_level,
> +				       void *context, void **ret)
> +{
> +	struct scan_check_crs_csi2_context inst_context = {
> +		.handle = handle,
> +		.res_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(inst_context.res_list),
> +	};
> +	struct list_head *list = context;
> +	struct crs_csi2 *csi2;

> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&inst_context.res_list);

Why do you need this? I don't see that variable is static...

> +	acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
> +			    scan_check_crs_csi2_instance, &inst_context);
> +
> +	if (list_empty(&inst_context.res_list))
> +		return AE_OK;
> +
> +	csi2 = kmalloc(sizeof(*csi2), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!csi2)
> +		return AE_OK;
> +
> +	csi2->handle = handle;
> +	list_replace(&inst_context.res_list, &csi2->buses);
> +	list_add(&csi2->list, list);

Hmm... Can list_swap() be used here?

> +	return AE_OK;
> +}

...

> +	/*
> +	 * Figure out how much temporary storage we need for counting
> +	 * connections in each device.
> +	 */
> +	list_for_each_entry(csi2, &crs_csi2_handles, list) {
> +		struct crs_csi2_instance *inst;
> +
> +		handle_count++;

> +		list_for_each_entry(inst, &csi2->buses, list)
> +			handle_count++;

list_count_nodes()?

> +	}

...

> +	sort(handle_refs, handle_count, sizeof(*handle_refs), crs_handle_cmp,
> +	     NULL);

Yes, I would leave it on one line.

...

> +		if (check_mul_overflow(sizeof(*ads->ports) +
> +				       sizeof(*ads->nodes) * 2 +
> +				       sizeof(*ads->nodeptrs) * 2,
> +				       (size_t)this_count, &alloc_size) ||

Can this_count be of size_t type from the beginning?

> +		    check_add_overflow(sizeof(*ads) + sizeof(*ads->nodes) +
> +				       sizeof(*ads->nodeptrs) * 2,
> +				       alloc_size, &alloc_size)) {
> +			acpi_handle_warn(handle, "too many handles (%u)",
> +					 this_count);
> +			continue;
> +		}

...

> +		ads->nodeptrs = (void *)(ads->nodes +
> +					 this_count * 2 + 1);

Why this is not on one line? (I have got less than 80).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko