From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9F0C43381 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2271565014 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:50:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229729AbhCENuU (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:50:20 -0500 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:48384 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229672AbhCENuT (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:50:19 -0500 IronPort-SDR: eAJy1ae7Va4R5pOyrLxoI/gEMOseyZkqVFzvMVIG9SqbClxXoeNKrnf1l0TSEpMkx9YJwMILHm LTDPKQNJeKmQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9913"; a="207386364" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,224,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="207386364" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Mar 2021 05:50:18 -0800 IronPort-SDR: +9PZG4eBpr+263b9cKPCPo/AqftsSUJm98S9toPXMYaVKYu4Yb3ow3n+kygbOjmWuT4KvCyvVf /KU4tdWCHiAw== X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,224,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="384915896" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40]) by orsmga002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Mar 2021 05:50:14 -0800 Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1lIAqH-00A8LA-E8; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 15:50:09 +0200 Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 15:50:09 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: kernel test robot , Mika Westerberg , Linus Walleij , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , ACPI Devel Maling List , Marc Zyngier , Bartosz Golaszewski , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [BUILD REGRESSION] LAST PATCH: gpiolib: Reuse device's fwnode to create IRQ domain Message-ID: References: <6041a2ff.18V+4AiVF2xWzVE+%lkp@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 02:06:54PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 1:31 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:18:23AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andy-Shevchenko/gpiolib-switch-to-fwnode-in-the-core/20210304-230747 > > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git e749df1bbd23f4472082210650514548d8a39e9b > > > > > > [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. > > > And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in > > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] > > > > > > > > > Error/Warning in current branch: > > > > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3672:24: warning: passing argument 1 of 'is_acpi_node' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3675:24: warning: passing argument 1 of 'is_acpi_node' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3686:24: error: passing 'const struct fwnode_handle *' to parameter of type 'struct fwnode_handle *' discards qualifiers [-Werror,-Wincompatible-pointer-types-discards-qualifiers] > > > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c:3686:24: warning: passing argument 1 of 'is_acpi_node' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers] > > > > Yeah, yeah. The fix should be in Rafael's tree. > > > > Rafael, can you submit it as material for v5.12-rcX, please? > > What exactly do you want me to submit for 5.12-rc and why is it urgent? I'm talking about https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210302133721.GG3@paasikivi.fi.intel.com/T/#u It's not urgent per se, but it rather makes life easier in case that my GPIO fwnode patch series will be routed thru the different tree (and I believe GPIO would like to have pull it as an immutable branch / tag). That said, I'm pretty much fine if the above mentioned fix will be in the same (immutable) branch for v5.13 cycle. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko