From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-acpi-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 976EAC433F5
	for <linux-acpi@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77DF561050
	for <linux-acpi@archiver.kernel.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2021 06:20:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S234130AbhJKGWE (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-acpi@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 11 Oct 2021 02:22:04 -0400
Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:63740 "EHLO mga07.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S233802AbhJKGWD (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 11 Oct 2021 02:22:03 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10133"; a="290299539"
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,363,1624345200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="290299539"
Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51])
  by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Oct 2021 23:20:03 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,363,1624345200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="440667869"
Received: from lahna.fi.intel.com (HELO lahna) ([10.237.72.163])
  by orsmga006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Oct 2021 23:19:57 -0700
Received: by lahna (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:19:55 +0300
Date:   Mon, 11 Oct 2021 09:19:55 +0300
From:   Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
        Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
        linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
        Kate Hsuan <hpa@redhat.com>, linux-media@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/11] ACPI: delay enumeration of devices with a _DEP
 pointing to an INT3472 device
Message-ID: <YWPXixp/J6KIzWp6@lahna>
References: <20211010185707.195883-1-hdegoede@redhat.com>
 <20211010185707.195883-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211010185707.195883-2-hdegoede@redhat.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-acpi.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 08:56:57PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> +/* List of HIDs for which we honor deps of matching ACPI devs, when checking _DEP lists. */
> +static const char * const acpi_honor_dep_ids[] = {
> +	"INT3472", /* Camera sensor PMIC / clk and regulator info */

Is there some reason why we can't do this for all devices with _DEP?
That way we don't need to maintain lists like this.

Otherwise looks good.